> Well that answers my question, sort of since you say don’t ask why you want to run a JVM’s as JavaScript instead of a browser plug-in.
Yes, it's just a proof-of-concept sort of, to also be able to integrate with the Browser's DOM and JavaScript environment. And it does not require the user to have Java installed, which is a pretty big pain for most corporate workplaces' policies. But imagine the possibilities you would have running Java (albeit of course slower since no JIT is available now) in a Browser with all the frameworks that are meant for server-side Java. :) This would hopefully make GWT obsolete (which also only supports Java 1.5, sort of) and would allow to program in full Java 1.8 (also everybody hates JavaScript :) , so I really think it's a nice idea. Write once, run (really) anywhere. :) Also Browser. > Thanks. I am very familiar with JNI. That was not meant as an insult by me, sorry. Cheers, Kai Am Samstag, 29. August 2015 01:21:00 UTC+2 schrieb キャロウ マーク: > > > > On Aug 28, 2015, at 12:51 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> > wrote: > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > what do you mean? I don't have "native code" on the browser platform. We > only have JavaScript functions, that were compiled-to from native "C" code. > > My general goal is to get a Java Virtual Machine working on the Browser > Platform via Emscripten (don't ask why :). > > Well that answers my question, sort of since you say don’t ask why you > want to run a JVM’s as JavaScript instead of a browser plug-in. > > > > > And a JVM uses "JNI" as the interface mechanism between Java and > whatever the "native" platform language is > > Thanks. I am very familiar with JNI. > > Good luck with your efforts. > > Regards > > -Mark > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
