I'm using the Windows binary package, and would like to be able to produce the same small package without all the extra gigabytes of intermediate build files.
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 1:29:29 PM UTC-4, Brion Vibber wrote: > > Out of curiosity, are you folks building on Linux (where the SDK doesn't > provide binary packages at all) or on Mac/Windows (where the SDK offers > binary packages for releases, but not for the incoming branch)? > > I'd kinda like binary builds on Linux too, but I know compatibility across > distributions tends to be a harder problem there. > > -- brion > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Robert Goulet <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I would be interested to get a "clean" option as well, because there's a >> huge difference in size between a binary package that we download from your >> web page, versus a build that we do locally. Don't you have some sort of >> automated script that we could use to package Emscripten on our side? >> >> >> On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 2:41:02 AM UTC-4, Sergey Solozhentsev >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I updated emscripten sdk using emsdk. I noticed that now it is built >>> from sources. I do not need sources and debug info. Is any way to clear all >>> sources debug info object files etc? Only necessary files? >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "emscripten-discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
