So I've gotten a chance to try this, but on test code it seems to enter an 
infinite loop. I left it running overnight. Is there some steps I can take 
to debug what's being run and why?

On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 9:06:48 PM UTC-8, Alon Zakai wrote:
>
> For an interpreter, there's the emterpreter in emscripten. Not sure it's 
> the simplest possible, though, it's more designed for speed.
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Aidan Hobson Sayers <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> This sounds neat! I've been pondering on an 'early-executor' and this is 
>> a really nice demonstration of both viability and utility.
>>
>> The things I've been thinking about is attempting to start running `main` 
>> as far as possible, so non-deterministic functions would end up bubbling up 
>> to the beginning. Are there any simple asm.js interpreters (i.e. reduced js 
>> interpreter) you're aware of? I suppose would need to be the first step - 
>> unlike the 'global ctors' work which looks like it effectively does 'dirty 
>> checking', I'd imagine this pass doing data dependency analysis to skip 
>> over e.g. `printf` calls since they might not have much impact on the 
>> actual flow of code (depending on the memory accesses etc inside these 
>> calls).
>>
>> On 8 March 2016 at 23:25, Alon Zakai <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The incoming branch (now 1.36.1) now has a new optimization when 
>>> building to JS with -Oz. It will eliminate C++ global constructor functions 
>>> aggressively, removing them from the codebase, removing the need to call 
>>> them during startup, and removing code that would otherwise be used only by 
>>> them.
>>>
>>> This makes -Oz when compiling to JS slower to compile than before, 
>>> almost 2x slower. To avoid that, you can disable this optimization (-s 
>>> EVAL_CTORS=0), or just use -Os. In general, -Oz is kind of the "try at all 
>>> costs to reduce code size", so it felt natural to include this optimization 
>>> there.
>>>
>>> The benefit can be noticeable. For example, this removes the 2 global 
>>> ctors that doing any C++ iostream usage would normally bring in, that 
>>> create the standard streams. This reduces code size by a few percent, as 
>>> well as JS compilation time, and startup is faster also because we can jump 
>>> right to executing main(). In general, of course, we can't remove all 
>>> ctors, as it might do something with side effects like printf or malloc, 
>>> which we can't optimize away. With EMCC_DEBUG=1 in the env, you'll see 
>>> logging that shows an error in such a case (which you can use to optimize 
>>> your codebase, if you want).
>>>
>>> This optimization was inspired by Cheerp's PreExecutor ( 
>>> http://blog.leaningtech.com/2016/02/cheerp-preexecuter-compile-time.html 
>>> ). That made me wonder, doesn't LLVM already do this? Turns out, yes, it 
>>> does, but at the IR level, and as a result is not as successful as it could 
>>> be, due to the complexity of LLVM IR. But at the asm.js level things are 
>>> very simple - in fact, this optimization just literally runs the code in a 
>>> JS sandbox, and sees if it ran without using anything nondeterministic. 
>>> That's after all the LLVM complexity was lowered out, and is basically 
>>> guaranteed to work when it should work. More details at
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/blob/incoming/src/settings.js#L699
>>>
>>> - Alon
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] 
>>> <javascript:>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Aidan
>>
>> Currently co-authoring a book on Docker 
>> <http://manning.com/miell/?a_aid=aidanhs&a_bid=e0d48f62> - get 39% off 
>> with the code 39miell
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "emscripten-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to