This is the approach that I'm currently using to proxy custom 
messages 
https://github.com/hoongern/emscripten/commit/6167ec91190723cb8621a26679d5e6cb7022a524
I can PR it if it's deemed useful.

On Thursday, May 5, 2016 at 3:17:09 AM UTC-7, awt wrote:
>
> Yes, if we send a 'custom' message over, it will go to the default branch 
> of the webworker's onmessage handler. Do we need to add something to 
> proxyworker.js to support custom data on the worker's side?
>
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 2:54:39 AM UTC+8, Alon Zakai wrote:
>>
>> You should be able to just postMessage to the thread in JS, and receive 
>> it in JS. The only risk is it might confuse our existing onmessage on the 
>> other side, so we might need to add a "custom message type".
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:05 AM, awt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a use case where I try to open a local file on the main thread 
>>> and try to send the contents as a buffer to the worker thread. Is this 
>>> possible with Proxy-To-Worker? At present, I only know that we can pass 
>>> keyboard and mouse events over to the worker thread.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to