I am facing the same issue On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 3:28:42 AM UTC+5:30, Alon Zakai wrote: > > The binder should keep around things that are bound, so that could be a > bug, please file an issue with a testcase. Best thing would be to file a PR > that adds to existing webidl test with something that breaks. > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Alan deLespinasse <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> This seems to still be a problem. In fact, not only classes, but ordinary >> functions bound with EMSCRIPTEN_BINDINGS seem to disappear when using -O2 >> or higher. Has anyone else had this problem? >> >> I can't find a filed bug for it. I'm happy to file one if it is in fact a >> bug. >> >> On Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 5:30:13 AM UTC-4, Björn K. wrote: >>> >>> Sorry for not providing accurate enough reproduction-steps. I've set up >>> a repository at github: https://github.com/cee-dee/emscripten-tests >>> Additionally I've created two issues which describe exactly what to do >>> in order to see the problems. >>> >>> The directory "embind-test-01" contains the problem which I mentioned >>> here, the directory "webidl-test-01" contains a reduced test where I >>> experimented with the webidl-binding, where I at least partially succeeded, >>> but still have the problem that --closure 1 won't produce usable results. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Björn >>> >>> >>> Am Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2015 20:54:25 UTC+2 schrieb Alon Zakai: >>>> >>>> I can't reproduce the problem on that testcase, but maybe we are doing >>>> things a little differently (it doesn't build by itself). Can you please >>>> file a github issue with complete steps to reproduce? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Björn K. <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi there! >>>>> >>>>> When using the sample c++ code from >>>>> >>>>> https://kripken.github.io/emscripten-site/docs/porting/connecting_cpp_and_javascript/embind.html#classes >>>>> it just works as long as I do not use the optimization -O2. >>>>> >>>>> When I compile with that option, my browser always tells me >>>>> "TypeError: Module.MyClass is not a constructor". In >>>>> https://kripken.github.io/emscripten-site/docs/porting/connecting_cpp_and_javascript/Interacting-with-code.html#calling-compiled-c-functions-from-javascript-using-ccall-cwrap >>>>> >>>>> it sais "At higher optimisation levels (-O2 and above), the *closure >>>>> compiler* >>>>> <https://kripken.github.io/emscripten-site/docs/site/glossary.html#term-closure-compiler> >>>>> >>>>> runs and minifies (changes) function names. Exporting functions allows >>>>> you >>>>> to continue to access them using the original name through the global >>>>> Module object.", so I tried using the option -s EXPORTED_FUNCTIONS, >>>>> but it seems to work only for functions, not classes. >>>>> >>>>> What am I doing wrong? Would it work to export global functions which >>>>> serve as constructors for my classes? Sounds like a hack to me... >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Björn >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "emscripten-discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
