WebAssembly is still not generally available on desktop, expect it to lag behind on mobile. I suspect that the reported size savings (~30%) reduction in wireless radio usage will dominate all but the most CPU intensive applications.
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:06:30 AM UTC-7, Gaurav Dewan wrote: > > Being natively built into javascript engine, WebAssembly is expected to be > power efficient. > > Has anybody done analysis on power efficiency of webassembly and asm.js ? > CPU consumption/energy rating of idle asm.js tab indeed shows up as > zero(<1); but are there any precise benchmarks/tools/methodologies/setup to > get (repeatable-)measurements with regard to cpu consumption of these > technologies ? > For example,is it possible to come up with a metric to compare cpu > efficiency of "WASM vs ASM.JS vs vanilla-js vs Native app" (with similar > functionality -idle and active usage scenario). > At the client side, I can think of power tests like observing cpu/energy > impact of process via task/activity montor or using tracing events > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
