yes it works without wasm. In fact the example is not done for wasm compilation, I was trying do adapt it. When adding the option -s WASM=1 -s BINARYEN_ASYNC_COMP=0, I get the following messages : " TypeError: Module.lerp is not a function[Learn More] quick_example.html:1313:41 trying binaryen method: native-wasm quick_example.html:1249:13 [post-exception status] Preparing... (0/1) quick_example.html:1249:13 [post-exception status] All downloads complete. quick_example.html:1249:13 binaryen method succeeded. quick_example.html:1249:13 [post-exception status] Running... quick_example.html:1249:13 pre-main prep time: 31 ms "
Then,if I type in the console "Module.lerp", it is eventually loaded. Le lundi 15 mai 2017 18:49:46 UTC+2, Alon Zakai a écrit : > > Does it work without wasm? I think that example in the docs does not > support async compilation, which we do by default for wasm now. If so > building with -s BINARYEN_ASYNC_COMPILATION=0 might fix it, but in that > case, we should fix the example of course. > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Romain Lvt <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> hello , I tried to use embind following the first example of this >> tutorial " >> https://kripken.github.io/emscripten-site/docs/porting/connecting_cpp_and_javascript/embind.html" >> >> , using the webassembly option for the compilation "emcc -o >> quick_example.html -s WASM=1" but i get the following output error when >> trying to open the html file in the browser: " >> run() called, but dependencies remain, so not running quick_ex.js:190:7 >> TypeError: Module.lerp is not a function[Learn More] quick_ex.html:12:35 >> pre-main prep time: 104 ms >> >> Does it mean that I missed a step in the compilation, or the binding ? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Le vendredi 4 novembre 2016 18:27:35 UTC+1, Alon Zakai a écrit : >>> >>> Yes, embind just needs the compiled code to be accessible and runnable. >>> It doesn't matter to it if that code is in asm.js or WebAssembly form. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:00 AM, matthias <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have read some articles about Webassembly. >>>> If I understand it right I can use emscripten to create webassembly. >>>> This is very nice, thank you. >>>> >>>> Is EMBIND also supported in this scenario? Can I use the exported >>>> EMBIND (Webassembly) classes from JavaScript? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "emscripten-discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
