Hi, I ran a performance test with the emscriptened LAPACK module, between two targets asm.js and WASM. The test performs a mathematical task (computing the equation of line passing through 10000 points using least squares approximation, which invokes LAPACK routines underneath). I ran it on Firefox 54 (64-bit) on Linux. I didn't see any significant difference between the running times with two versions of lapack. In fact asm.js-LAPACK was a bit faster than WASM-LAPACK.
asm.js LAPACK time = 120.8 msec WASM LAPACK time = 125.4 msec You can see the code here https://github.com/bluemathsoft/bluemath/blob/master/test/perf-index.ts Is this expected? Or is it too early in development of WASM to compare its speed with asm.js? Thanks. -- Jayesh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
