Without -g2 I have this error:
g[a+4>>2]=-$|0;

In function:
function Bg(a,b,$){a=a|0;b=b|0;$=+$;g[a>>2]=0.0;g[a+4>>2]=-$|0;return}

And SFE on roll-a-ball project still does not work with same error. I
start believe that I doing something wrong in build steps...

P.S. My projects have a lot of undefined symbols (but they does not
used), can this be a problem?



2017-08-23 13:34 GMT+07:00 Александр Гурьянов <[email protected]>:
> Hi. After your commit -g2 error gone. But my project does not work. I
> see black screen (no errors, just black screen). And this error:
>
> TypeError: asm.js type error: void incompatible with previous return of type 
> f64
>
> If I remove -g2 game works (but asm.js not). Btw, I trying to find how
> to reporduce.
>
> The code for "asm.js type error: void incompatible with previous
> return of type f64" is:
>
> function _roundf(d1){d1=+d1;(Jl(d1))}
>
> grep for _roundf in js:
>>2]|0)+284>>2]|0;d37=+_roundf(+d28);d42=+_roundf(+
>>2]|0)+284>>2]|0;d28=+_roundf(+d44);d42=+_roundf(+
>>2]|0)+284>>2]|0;d50=+_roundf(+d37);FUNCTION_TABLE
>>2]|0)+284>>2]|0;d50=+_roundf(+(d37+d28));FUNCTION
> 1=HEAP32[i8>>2]|0;d2=+_roundf(+ +HEAPF32[i1+20>>2]
> HEAP32[i10>>2]|0;d13=+_roundf(+(d2*+HEAPF32[i1+20>
> AP32[i1+8>>2]|0;i9=~~+_roundf(+(+(i7|0)*1.5/+HEAPF
>>2]|0;HEAPF32[i6>>2]=+_roundf(+d7);HEAPF32[i8>>2]=
> =i1|0;var i2=0;i2=~~-+_roundf(+(+HEAPF64[i1+224>>3
>  DO(i1,24)|0}function _roundf(d1){d1=+d1;(Jl(d1))}
> serialization_pb_cpp, _roundf: _roundf, __GLOBAL__
>
> 2017-08-23 5:00 GMT+07:00 arnab choudhury <[email protected]>:
>> Hello caiiycuk - the latest commit to the master branch fixes this issue.
>> Please let me know if you see any issues. Thanks for the due diligence!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arnab
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 12:36:23 PM UTC-7, arnab choudhury wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for catching this caiiycuk - I can repro and will have a fix out
>>> shortly. Looks like a name-clash bug in the minified name generator SFE
>>> uses.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 10:17:15 AM UTC-7, caiiiycuk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> While trying to reproduce asm.js error, I found another problem. SFE
>>>> wan't work with -g2 flag, you can reporduce this problem with latest
>>>> emscripten:
>>>>
>>>> ./emcc -O2 -g2 -s USE_COCOS2D=3 -s ASM_JS=1 --std=c++11
>>>> ./tests/cocos2d_hello.cpp --preload-file
>>>>
>>>> ~/.emscripten_ports/Cocos2d/Cocos2d-version_3_2/samples/Cpp/HelloCpp/Resources@
>>>> -o cocos.html
>>>>
>>>> node --max-old-space-size=8192 run_sfe.js --file cocos.js | sponge
>>>> cocos.js
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> firefox cocos.html
>>>>
>>>> error:
>>>> cocos.html:1249 exception thrown: TypeError: $[(A & 3)] is not a
>>>> function,TypeError: $[(A & 3)] is not a function
>>>>     at BY
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:2320580)
>>>>     at __ZNSt3__26locale8__globalEv
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:2159273)
>>>>     at __ZNSt3__26localeC2Ev
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:2160617)
>>>>     at __ZNSt3__28ios_base4initEPv
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:2048889)
>>>>     at __ZN7cocos2d8BitmapDC12divideStringEP9_TTF_FontPKcii
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:350499)
>>>>     at __ZN7cocos2d8BitmapDC9getBitmapEPKciiNS_5Image9TextAlignES2_f
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:748315)
>>>>     at __ZN7cocos2d5Image14initWithStringEPKciiNS0_9TextAlignES2_i
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:1308234)
>>>>     at __ZN7cocos2d9Texture2D14initWithStringEPKcRKNS_14FontDefinitionE
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:1778238)
>>>>     at
>>>> __ZN7cocos2d9Texture2D14initWithStringEPKcS2_fRKNS_4SizeENS_14TextHAlignmentENS_14TextVAlignmentE
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:1354460)
>>>>     at __ZN7cocos2d8LabelTTF13updateTextureEv
>>>>
>>>> (file:///home/caiiiycuk/emscripten/sdk/emscripten/cocos2d/cocos.js:10311:1666246)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Error only occurs in chrome, or is you disable asm.js mode (for
>>>> example by debugger)
>>>>
>>>> 2017-08-22 23:42 GMT+07:00 arnab choudhury <[email protected]>:
>>>> > So - replacing 'Module["asm"] =' with 'var asm =' in build.asm.js
>>>> > followed
>>>> > by an attempt to run SFE succeeds. I see the following reduction
>>>> > (around
>>>> > 8%).
>>>> >
>>>> > 08/22/2017  09:15 AM        19,782,571 build.asm.js
>>>> > 08/22/2017  09:39 AM        18,225,058 build.asm.reduced.js
>>>> >
>>>> > I think the core problem right now is that we currently don't support
>>>> > running SFE on Emscripten generated JS that was built with the
>>>> > --separate-asm flag. I'll look into fixing this today.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Arnab
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 9:25:32 AM UTC-7, caiiiycuk wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Great. I will try to reproduce asm.js bug. Btw, if you build
>>>> >> roll-a-ball project in Unity, then output will be in Unity format
>>>> >> (also js, but with Unity loader, Unity staff). You can find emscripten
>>>> >> output in Project/Library/webgl_cache/linkresult_asm/ folder.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2017-08-22 23:15 GMT+07:00 arnab choudhury <[email protected]>:
>>>> >> > Hi caiiycuk
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I'll have an update here shortly. I would love to be able to
>>>> >> > reproduce
>>>> >> > the
>>>> >> > non-asm.js bug since we have extensive tests for this at Tableau.
>>>> >> > I'm
>>>> >> > trying
>>>> >> > out the roll-a-ball project right now, will get back shortly.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Regards,
>>>> >> > Arnab
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 3:07:44 AM UTC-7, caiiiycuk wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> As I see using SFE breaks asm.js validity? On my another project
>>>> >> >> sfe
>>>> >> >> produce js less on 500Kb (from 6.5Mb), but FF says:
>>>> >> >> TypeError: asm.js type error: double is not a subtype of intish
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> 2017-08-22 11:33 GMT+07:00 Александр Гурьянов <[email protected]>:
>>>> >> >> > Roll a ball project:
>>>> >> >> > https://www.assetstore.unity3d.com/en/#!/content/77198
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > 2017-08-22 11:32 GMT+07:00 Александр Гурьянов
>>>> >> >> > <[email protected]>:
>>>> >> >> >> Hi. I tried to use SFE on Roll-a-ball demo project, and get same
>>>> >> >> >> results. Unity uses --separate-asm flag to build asm.js.
>>>> >> >> >> Resulting
>>>> >> >> >> js
>>>> >> >> >> looks like:
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Module["asm"] = (function(global,env,buffer) {
>>>> >> >> >> "use asm";var a=new global.Int8Array(buffer);var b=new
>>>> >> >> >> global.Int16Array(buffer);...
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> I tried to remove wrapping function (Module["asm"] =
>>>> >> >> >> (function(global,env,buffer) { ... }), and code looks like:
>>>> >> >> >> "use asm";var a=new global.Int8Array(buffer);var b=new
>>>> >> >> >> global.Int16Array(buffer);...
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> When I run SFE I have another error:
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> /home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:5701
>>>> >> >> >>             throw e;
>>>> >> >> >>             ^
>>>> >> >> >> Error: Line 25: Illegal return statement
>>>> >> >> >>     at constructError
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:2406:21)
>>>> >> >> >>     at createError
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:2425:17)
>>>> >> >> >>     at tolerateError
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:2460:17)
>>>> >> >> >>     at parseReturnStatement
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:4533:13)
>>>> >> >> >>     at parseStatement
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:4780:24)
>>>> >> >> >>     at parseStatementListItem
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:3988:16)
>>>> >> >> >>     at parseScriptBody
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:5489:25)
>>>> >> >> >>     at parseProgram
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:5505:16)
>>>> >> >> >>     at Object.parse
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/node_modules/esprima/esprima.js:5689:23)
>>>> >> >> >>     at SimilarFunctionEliminator.srcToAst
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> (/home/caiiiycuk/sdk/Similar-Function-Elimination/src/similar_function_eliminator.js:35:20)
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Maybe I doing something wrong. Can you try? Resulting js is here
>>>> >> >> >> (build.asm.js):
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B28AXjYMDNZscDFlZTdWMGMzQkU/view?usp=sharing
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Thank you!
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> 2017-08-22 1:35 GMT+07:00 Александр Гурьянов
>>>> >> >> >> <[email protected]>:
>>>> >> >> >>> I think that error can be reporudced on any Unity project, I
>>>> >> >> >>> will
>>>> >> >> >>> check and back) Btw, thanks for nice stuff!
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> 2017-08-22 1:27 GMT+07:00 arnab choudhury <[email protected]>:
>>>> >> >> >>>> Thanks Alon :).
>>>> >> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>> Caiiycuk, is the codebase you are trying to run SFE on
>>>> >> >> >>>> available
>>>> >> >> >>>> publicly?
>>>> >> >> >>>> Can you post the github link here if so? If not, take a look
>>>> >> >> >>>> at
>>>> >> >> >>>> the
>>>> >> >> >>>> generated JS on which you are going to run SFE on. Make sure
>>>> >> >> >>>> that
>>>> >> >> >>>> there is a
>>>> >> >> >>>> top level global variable called asm. If the asm.js is
>>>> >> >> >>>> wrapped,
>>>> >> >> >>>> then
>>>> >> >> >>>> you
>>>> >> >> >>>> might have to save off the asm.js (the part of the code that
>>>> >> >> >>>> contains
>>>> >> >> >>>> a top
>>>> >> >> >>>> level variable called asm) to a separate file and try running
>>>> >> >> >>>> SFE
>>>> >> >> >>>> on
>>>> >> >> >>>> that to
>>>> >> >> >>>> see the potential size reduction.
>>>> >> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>> Regards,
>>>> >> >> >>>> Arnab
>>>> >> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>> On Monday, August 21, 2017 at 10:47:22 AM UTC-7, Alon Zakai
>>>> >> >> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>> Very interesting stuff here! :)
>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>> I opened this issue for implementation in Binaryen:
>>>> >> >> >>>>> https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/issues/1142
>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:24 AM, arnab choudhury
>>>> >> >> >>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Hello Emscripten-Discuss
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> I just wanted to bring folks' attention to a new post-build
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> optimization
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> pass for Emscripten generated asm.js called Similar Function
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Elimination
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> (SFE) that Tableau recently open sourced. I discussed with
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Alon,
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> and our
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> thinking is that we will be adding this pass to Binaryen's
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> web
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> assembly
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> generator. Given that everyone is moving to Web Assembly, we
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> are
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> thinking we
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> may not add this pass back to Emscripten. However, that
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> being
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> said,
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> the
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Emscripten community should feel free to use Similar
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Function
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Elimination on
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Emscripten generated asm.js if you need the additional size
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> reduction.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/achoudhury85/Similar-Function-Elimination
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> At Tableau, we have observed up to 20% code size reduction
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> when
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> using SFE
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> on template heavy codebases.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Regards,
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Arnab
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> --
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Google
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Groups
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> from
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> it,
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> send an
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> email to [email protected].
>>>> >> >> >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>>> --
>>>> >> >> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>> >> >> >>>> Google
>>>> >> >> >>>> Groups
>>>> >> >> >>>> "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>>> >> >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>> >> >> >>>> it,
>>>> >> >> >>>> send an
>>>> >> >> >>>> email to [email protected].
>>>> >> >> >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> >> > Groups
>>>> >> > "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> >> > send
>>>> >> > an
>>>> >> > email to [email protected].
>>>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> > Groups
>>>> > "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> > an
>>>> > email to [email protected].
>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "emscripten-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to