Yes, building linkable modules is an important use case, that won't be dropped.
The details of how SIDE_MODULE works might change, depending on the wasm spec, of course. On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Jean Valjean <me...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Also, is it safe to think «-s WASM=1 -s SIDE MODULE=2» will stay > maintained in future release? Should I move to the vanilla LLVM ? > > > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 8:01:39 PM UTC+2, Jean Valjean wrote: >> >> Sorry, I forgot to say I use the *-s ONLY_MY_CODE=1 -s WASM=1 -s >> SIDE_MODULE=2* parameters, and *-s ONLY_MY_CODE=1* works well with *-s >> SIDE_MODULE=2*, also, it produces a lightweight *.wasm* output. >> >> Since the 1.37.20, emscripten is now able to deal with *-s >> EXPORTED_FUNCTIONS*. It's fine for me now. >> >> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 5:35:10 AM UTC+2, Jean Valjean wrote: >>> >>> Hello there :) >>> >>> Right now, -s EXPORTED_FUNCTIONS doesn't seem to work with Standalone >>> webassembly (provided by -s ONLY_MY_CODE=1 -s WASM=1 ). The code exports a >>> lot of functions and it makes the wasm output really big. Is there an >>> available parameter for this ? >>> >>> Bye >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
