Hmm, yeah, I guess it's not that easy. The actual implementations are completely separate though, so it could work, but I guess something would need to be figured out with those includes.
I agree that the best thing would be if someone volunteered to port SDL2_mixer. On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Goran Milovanovic <goranmilov...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it would be worthwhile: A lot of SDL projects usually leverage the > extra SDL libraries for common requirements like image loading, font > rendering, and audio mixing. With SDL1, where all those libraries are > supported, developers don't have to rewrite their code, but for SDL2, where > there's no mixer support, developers have to go hunting for a new audio > system. It wouldn't be as annoying if there were no other SDL2 library > ports, but since there are basically ports for everything else, it becomes > a missing piece that's forcing the developer to do significantly more work, > just to have basic audio capability. > > If it's possible to use SDL1 audio with SDL2, that would be fine, but I > don't know how to set that up. I tried simply compiling: > > > em++ $SRC_DIR/*.cpp -I $INC_DIR -s WASM=1 -s USE_SDL=2 -s > USE_SDL_IMAGE=2 -o out.bc > > But that results in an error: > > > fatal error: 'SDL_mixer.h' file not found > > #include "SDL_mixer.h" > > > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 1:34:49 PM UTC-4, Alon Zakai wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Goran Milovanovic <goranm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> As Floh mentioned, it seems to have substandard multiplatform support, >>> so it's not really a good solution for me. >>> >>> What I really find hard to understand, is why there's no SDL2_mixer >>> port, because, as I noted before, there's a port for everything else, and >>> obviously SDL_mixer_1.2 is supported internally, so it seems like it should >>> be possible to make SDL2_mixer work with emscripten. >>> >> >> It should be possible, yeah. I think it's just that the other solutions >> are good enough for most people, so no one was motivated to port SDL2_mixer >> yet. But it would be great if someone did. >> >> Btw, it should be possible to mix SDL1 audio with everything else from >> SDL2, the implementations should not collide (but I didn't verify this). >> >> >>> >>> On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 6:11:24 PM UTC-4, Alon Zakai wrote: >>>> >>>> Another option is OpenAL. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Александр Гурьянов <caii...@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> I prefer to use SDL_mixer_1.2 it works fast. Also it supports ogg, mp3 >>>>> panning and dinstance. >>>>> >>>>> 2017-08-29 21:55 GMT+07:00 Goran Milovanovic <goranm...@gmail.com>: >>>>> > I would like to compile a project that's built on top of SDL2 >>>>> libraries. One >>>>> > of those libraries is SDL2_mixer, which seems to have no emscripten >>>>> port ... >>>>> > I find that strange, because there's a port for everything else (even >>>>> > SDL2_net), and audio seems like one of the more fundamental >>>>> requirements for >>>>> > a large number of applications. >>>>> > >>>>> > So, I'm just wondering why there's no port for SDL2_mixer, and what >>>>> people >>>>> > typically do for sound+music support (I hope it's something other >>>>> than "use >>>>> > SDL1"). >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks. >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>> > "emscripten-discuss" group. >>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>> send an >>>>> > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
