Hmm, wasm does trap on some float-to-int overflows and things like that,
but "index out of bounds" sounds like a memory access error - could be a
bug in the code being compiled. If it doens't look like that, I can debug a
testcase if you have one.

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, that works well.
>
> Now the 2 modules can be properly linked with wasm-merge and the resulting
> one compiled and instantiated in JS context.
>
> Next problem is this kind of error when running it : "RuntimeError: index
> out of bounds"  when calling (for instance...) the fast_log10f function of
> the following code compiled to wasm with emcc 1.17.21 :
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/grame-cncm/faust/master-
> dev/architecture/faust/dsp/fastmath.cpp
>
> Is there any specific precautions to take when compiling the fastmath.cpp
> code ? Range issues ? Anything else?
>
> Le lundi 27 novembre 2017 21:45:01 UTC+1, Alon Zakai a écrit :
>>
>> I think emscripten's LEGALIZE_JS_FFI option can help there, -s
>> LEGALIZE_JS_FFI=0 will make it not emit asm.js-compatible function types,
>> so it should have normal f32s.
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:54 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> OK. I'll have to checkout for memory segments. And I had to change the
>>> import naming convention off our generated module to use "env". Now "call
>>>  merge" are correctly generated.
>>>
>>> One issue still. The "fastmath" C++ module has 2 set of functions, one
>>> using "float" type and one using "double". The code is compiled with emcc
>>> -O3 -s WASM=1 -s SIDE_MODULE=1 xxx but the generated wast/wasm still uses
>>> f64 type even for  "float" versions (doing float/double cast...). Why is
>>> that? Is there a way to correctly general f32 versions of the function when
>>> the original C++ code is using "float" ?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Le samedi 25 novembre 2017 03:33:09 UTC+1, Alon Zakai a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Oh, they have memory segments - do you ensure they don't collide
>>>> manually? No need for runtime relocations? The merger should just work on
>>>> that, but it can't check for errors on it.
>>>>
>>>> The merger resolves imports and exports, if one module exports A and
>>>> the other imports env.A, then in the merged module that import becomes
>>>> something in the module that is called directly. This does make the
>>>> assumption that exports are on "env", which is the convention (wasm
>>>> imports/exports are a little odd in that imports have two components but
>>>> exports have one). See for example
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/blob/master/test/
>>>> merge/fusing.wast
>>>>
>>>> which merged with
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/blob/master/test/
>>>> merge/fusing.wast.toMerge
>>>>
>>>> results in
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/blob/master/test/
>>>> merge/fusing.wast.combined
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:22 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Both modules have memory segments.
>>>>>
>>>>> By asking the lines   (import "env" "memoryBase" (global $memoryBase
>>>>> i32)) and  (import "env" "tableBase" (global $tableBase i32)) in our
>>>>> generated oddly, the wasm-merge runs without errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I'm still not clear in how functions exported by one module (the
>>>>> fastmath version of math functions) can be imported (= used) but the other
>>>>> one? Is that possible?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mercredi 22 novembre 2017 19:08:03 UTC+1, Alon Zakai a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We should support both 1 and 2, not hard, just hasn't been done yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But first, let me ask about your use case: the "no memory base was
>>>>>> imported" message is too general (we should fix that), but it is there
>>>>>> because if there isn't a memory base, then memory isn't relocatable, and 
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> can't merge memories. So that can only work if the modules don't have
>>>>>> memory segments. Is that the case for you, it's just code, not data?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you don't have data, then as a temporary workaround you can just
>>>>>> import the relocatable offsets, adding
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   (import "env" "memoryBase" (global $memoryBase i32))
>>>>>>   (import "env" "tableBase" (global $tableBase i32))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But we should also make it work if those don't exist, assuming there
>>>>>> is no data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:20 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our Faust compiler (faust.grame.fr) can directly generate wasm
>>>>>>> modules from the Faust DSP source code. We typically generate modules 
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> need mathematical functions (log, sin, pow...) which are imported from 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> JS context (by generating the appropriate module "import" section).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We would like to test our Faust generated wasm code using more
>>>>>>> optimized mathematical functions (so using a fast_log, fast_sin,
>>>>>>> fast_pow versions of the functions). Those functions are coded in a C++
>>>>>>> file, then compiled as a wasm module using emcc -O3 -s WASM=1 -s
>>>>>>> SIDE_MODULE=1 fastmath.cpp -o fastmath.wasm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then we tried to link the fastmath.wasm module using the wasm-merge
>>>>>>> tool, so doing (for a given pre-compiled Faust DSP filterBank.wasm 
>>>>>>> module)
>>>>>>> : wasm-merge filterBank.wasm fastmath.wasm, but we get the error : 
>>>>>>> "Fatal:
>>>>>>> no memory base was imported"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) is the wasm-merge tool ready for that kind of use case? If yes
>>>>>>> how it should be used?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) will the wasm-merge code be part of the binaryen.js library, so
>>>>>>> that liking wasm modules could possibly dynamically be done in a Web 
>>>>>>> page,
>>>>>>> or used in nodejs context for instance ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to