Can you perhaps attach the failing code?   We don't have any current know
issues with pthread locks of semaphores that I know of.   Does the code in
question work in non-emscripten environments?

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:04 PM SK <sarangkarandi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm using Emscripten with "-s USE_PTHREADS=1 -s PROXY_TO_PTHREAD=1
> -s PROXY_POSIX_SOCKETS=1 -pthread -g4" compile/ link options to compile two
> different object files which are then linked together in the end with same
> options.
>
> However, I'm finding that in object 2, if I use pthread_mutex_* APIs the
> second call fails with EINVAL, also sem_*() APIs too fail with same EINVAL.
> However, if I allocate ,initialize and return a pointer to pthread_mutex_t
> variable after initialization in object 1, it works perfectly fine. Lock/
> unlock also works fine with pointer passing from object 2 -> 1. But still,
> the later pthread_cond_wait() calls fail again with EINVAL.
>
> Am I missing any compiler/ linker flags here? I can reproduce the issue in
> both Win 10 & Ubuntu 20.04 Chrome as well as Linux Firefox.
>
> Thanks,
> Sarang.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/eafcaaf3-2745-41f2-a3b2-793a6e27ff89n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/eafcaaf3-2745-41f2-a3b2-793a6e27ff89n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/CAL_va2-P0CYepOYLHtMZB%3DJo_gmUEN1vEa4rsSdMnH2gyFu6Kg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to