On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:13 PM Mahesh Velankar <[email protected]> wrote:
> First I tried it with auto tools (since hunspell was already built for > wasm using auto tools)......I refereed to the same (hunspell-wasm) build > environment and just changed the details to get my wasm..........and that > worked very very well.........Speed was amazing in the web page. > > Then I tried to build the same code with cmake..... as I wanted to do the > whole thing by myself .... better than the above copy paste approach for > future support. I thought cmake was easier to grasp than autotools,. So I > followed a tutorial and successfully built the wasm. That wasm also worked > > However strangely this cmake based wasm performs about 10 times slower > than the autotools based built wasm. (this 10 times thing is just a > guess......no measurement......but it moves with ant's speed compared to > the earlier) > As a guess, did you not include an optimization option in the compiler flags on the CMake version? -- brion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/CAFnWYTkpuHkkwYGcgyejf6YDYaG_6A47P8Y_UY4UnesOT9i6MA%40mail.gmail.com.
