Well I think I know to look into the nico/nimlang side of things now at
least.

Thank you for your help!

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 2:00 PM 'Sam Clegg' via emscripten-discuss <
emscripten-discuss@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Could you elaborate a little bit on what the problem with using `bool`
> is?   Could you perhaps link to your issue/discussion?
>
> We use `bool` a bunch now in emscripten, including at the wasm/JS boundary.
>
> I have seen one issue where we were passing values other than 1 or 0, and
> the C compiler was treating it as undefined behaviour.
>
> Other than that, I don't think I've heard of any other issues.    If this
> issue seems like a serious blocker on your side perhaps open an issue in
> the bug tracker and we can continue discussion there?
>
> cheers,
> sam
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 9:30 AM Tim Tommerson <tim666tom...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recently hit a snag using nim with emscripten. The issue was caused by
>> a recent commit:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/commit/3dfabe6ded598cd23c64968ae213ea98a0ad180f
>>
>> The commit changes the type signatures to bool from int which caused an
>> issue with ctype support in the nim language. This may be specific to the
>> integration of emsdk as opposed to nimlang itself. However I just wanted to
>> ask here if the change to bool from int would cause more issues down the
>> line, specifically in regard to C23 and its redefinition of bool.
>>
>> Ive engaged with the nimlang matrix chat to make them at least aware of
>> the issue. The fix from there end for me at least was to add a hackyfix to
>> the ctypes to make it work, though that will have to change when C23 is
>> supported I guess.
>>
>> thanks for your time
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "emscripten-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/4bd55732-08fb-4241-b74a-3f5039778ed9n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/4bd55732-08fb-4241-b74a-3f5039778ed9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/CAL_va2_Fm7J6_GOAHjQeVBSEE-2m66%2BULcH1htOYxBYt5aTrJg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/CAL_va2_Fm7J6_GOAHjQeVBSEE-2m66%2BULcH1htOYxBYt5aTrJg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/CAHyz_Ammr4vHtbsAUXoPmj6%2B8LFSvvdTNqg9PC9DNrrDfWUB1Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to