AES-CBC seems like a good choice. Joe
> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Clancy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 5:52 PM > To: Lakshminath Dondeti > Cc: emu@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] Duplicate integrity protection on > Protected Payload datain GPSK > > > My reading of the GPSK draft is that the Protected Payload > data will > be integrity protected using the MAC from the > combined mode and there > is the integrity checksum over the > entire GPSK-Message. I think we > should avoid the multiple MACs. > > ... > > > I am curious about others' opinions on EAX vs. CCM. > > We could replace AES-EAX with AES-CBC. Would address both > your concerns? > > -- > t. charles clancy, ph.d. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.cs.umd.edu/~clancy > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
