Sounds like a good compromise. ________________________________
From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 2/20/2007 9:53 PM To: Ryan Hurst; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Emu] RE: draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-07.txt > The subject field identifies the entity associated with the public > key stored in the subject public key field. The subject name MAY > be carried in the subject field and/or the subjectAltName > extension... If subject naming information is present only in the > subjectAltName extension (e.g., a key bound only to an email > address or URI), then the subject name MUST be an empty sequence > and the subjectAltName extension MUST be critical. > > Where it is non-empty, the subject field MUST contain an X.500 > distinguished name (DN). > >[rmh] We do not universally quote deep references in this document, what >criteria are being applied to determine which references will warrant a >reference + quote vs. just a reference? [BA] I just realized that the last sentence of the first paragraph is already in the document. I think the quote can be eliminated if we add the sentence "where it is non-empty..." into the text as well.
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
