Let's assume for the moment that there are good deployment reasons why 
you want to use a password based authentication method without running 
it in combination with pk-based server side authentication then TLS-SRP 
dumped into EAP would be my choice.
The reasons are:
* already specified and analysed quite well
* implementations available.

I am going to ask around whether someone could write a quick 
implementation to see how long it takes.

Ciao
Hannes


Dan Harkins wrote:

>> To continue on the previous discussions about this subject (with a
>> different subject):
>>
>> a) I believe the document does not do a good job in describing where you
>> plan to use this method in comparison to the already ongoing work on
>> tunneled mechanisms.
>>
>> To quote Bernard on a previous mailing list thread (see mail thread
>> about "Thoughts on Password-based EAP Methods" from March 2007, at
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/emu/current/msg00476.html)
>> "
>>  > I am concerned that by defining yet another password-based
>>  > authentication mechanism,
>>
>> "
>>
>> I understood that Bernard has a different opinion now and maybe his
>> comment was influenced in other ways back then in the style of
>> "... there we discussed tunneled methods and not password based methods in
>> general ..."
>>
>>
>> b) Assuming that bullet (a) provides a reasonable argument I believe
>> that the suggested approach is wrong.
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>>
>> Dan Harkins wrote:
>>     
>>>   Hello,
>>>
>>>   There's a new I-D in the Internet-Drafts database called
>>> draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-00.txt. It describes a new method
>>> for authentication using only a password. It provides resistance
>>> to active attack, passive attack, and dictionary attack. It
>>> also provides forward secrecy and an authenticated key (not just
>>> a shared key between authenticated entities).
>>>
>>>   Please take a look and send comments to the authors.
>>>
>>>   regards,
>>>
>>>   Dan.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emu mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to