> > Are you saying that the registry of "EAP-FAST PAC Attribute > Types" also > > relates to RFC 4507, which is a standards track document? > [Joe] This is not directly related to 4507. RFC 4507 treats tickets as opaque.
> > If so, then I may see your point. RFC 5226 does permit > vendor-specific > > registries. However, if the registry relates to a Standards > Track protocol under > > IETF change control, then restricting vendor-specific > extensions to only one > > vendor would be highly unusual. > > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
