I'm fine with this text.
Thanks,
Yaron> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 22:16 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Emu] Issue #15: Algorithm agility and certs > > > Issue: > > Sec. 4.1.1 has requirements on algorithm agility. They are important, > but insufficient. I propose to mention that when the tunnel method uses > certificates, it MUST be possible to migrate to new algorithms for such > certificates as well. (This possibly belongs in 4.2.1). > > Comment: > > Proposed Text in section 4.1.1: > > " The tunnel method MUST NOT be tied to any single cryptographic > algorithm. Instead, it MUST support run-time negotiation to select > among an extensible set of cryptographic algorithms. This includes > algorithms used with certificates presented during tunnel establishment. > ..." > > -- > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/trac/ticket/15#comment:1> > emu <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/> > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > > Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
