I agree that this is still to vague. Does anyone have any suggestions? Unless we can make this more specific I think the following text would be better:
"The password authentication exchange MUST support password change. The exchange SHOULD be extensible to support other "housekeeping" functions, such as the management of PINs or other data, required by some systems." Thanks, Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:41 PM > To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey); [email protected] > Subject: RE: Issue #17: What is "housekeeping" > > Well, this could stand even more detail, but fine... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of > > Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) > > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 22:18 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Emu] Issue #17: What is "housekeeping" > > > > #17: What is "housekeeping" > > > > Issue: > > > > "The password authentication exchange MUST support password > change, as > > well as other "housekeeping" functions, such as the > management of PINs > > or other data, required by some systems." > > > > Comment: > > > > Suggested Change: > > > > "The password authentication exchange MUST support > password change, > > as well as other "housekeeping" functions, such as the > management of > > PINs or other data, required by some systems." > > > > -- > > Ticket URL: > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/trac/ticket/17#comment:1> > > emu <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emu mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > > > > Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway. > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
