yes -----Original Message----- From: Sean Turner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 7:13 PM To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Emu] Tunnel method requirements: Mandatory attributes
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote: > We had some discussion of the mandatory attributes section in Anaheim. > There was disagreement on the exact behavior of mandatory attributes. > Instead of describing a specific behavior in the requirements document I > think it would be better to include the requirement instead. > > Proposed modification: > > Replace section " 4.3.3. Mandatory and Optional Attributes" with > > "4.3.3 Indicating criticality of Attributes > > It is expected that new attributes will be defined to be carried within > the tunnel method. In some cases it is necessary for the sender to know > if the receiver did not understand the attribute. To support this, > there MUST be a way for the sender to mark attributes such that the > receiver will indicate if an attribute is not understood. " Just to be clear, you're suggesting that this one paragraph replace all of the paragraphs in 4.3.3? spt _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
