Glen Zorn wrote: >>> Note the use of "should". >> Which is a common practice. > > ???
3580 says Called-Station-Id SHOULD include the SSID. Most APs do include the SSID. >> However, SSIDs are *likely* to be unique within a roamin >> consortium. This is because the parties talk to each other, and can >> complain when the SSIDs are unknown, or re-used. > > What parties? The BSSs? Why? The parties in a roaming consortium talk to each other. >> There are mitigating circumstances. AAA relationships leverage trust. >> Continued trust depends on the parties continuing to meet expectations. >> Lying about SSIDs violates trust. > > But fraud doesn't? Yes, fraud violates trust. My original post included an example of fraud, stated why this was bad, and how channel bindings could help. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
