>>>>> "Hoeper" == Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37 <[email protected]> writes:

    Hoeper> I agree. That's why I was thinking that adding a reference
    Hoeper> that makes implementers aware of this problem would be a
    Hoeper> good idea. Then they can make an educated decision about
    Hoeper> whether they want to implement additional mitigation
    Hoeper> techniques (i.e. enforce policies) or to not use
    Hoeper> password-based inner methods.

Well, we also want to make sure that if you're using a non-password
inner method, then we are not vulnerable to MITM issues.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to