Thanks, Bernard. That's very helpful. As I said during the WG meeting in Prague, the IPR that worries me most is that which is not disclosed and for which no licensing has been offered. But still it's valuable to see what's known.
Take care, Steve From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Emu] EAP tunnel method disclosures on www.ietf.org Here are IETF IPR disclosures which may be relevant to the tunnel method discussion: 2011-03-18 1519 Cisco's Statement of IPR Related to draft-zhou-emu-eap-fastv2-00<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1519/> 2008-12-04 1039 Cisco's Statement of IPR related to draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-provisioning-10<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1039/> 2007-02-02 802 Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-provisioning-03.txt<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/802/> 2005-10-28 655 Microsoft's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-02.txt<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/655/> 2005-10-28 656 Microsoft's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-badra-eap-double-tls-03.txt<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/656/> 2005-07-06 595 Nokia Corporation's statement about IPR claimed in draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-02.txt<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/595/> 2004-02-16 337 Cisco's Statement About IPR Claimed in draft-cam-winget-eap-fast<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/337/> 2002-11-12 96 Microsoft's patent statement pertaining to Protected EAP Protocol (PEAP) (draft-josefsson-pppext-eap-tls-eap-02.txt and draft-kamath-pppext-peapv0-00.txt)<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/96/>
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
