I counted five responses: Q1: 5 yes 0 no
Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2 2 EAP-TEAM Katrin > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan > DeKok > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method > > > We had 4 responses on the list, in addition to the discussion at IETF. > > Q1: 4 yes > 0 No > > Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2 > 1 EAP-TEAM > > The WG consensus is that EAP-FASTv2 should be the tunnel method. > > Alan DeKok wrote: > > For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer > > the following consensus call: > > > > Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled method? > > > > Please indicate Yes or No. > > > > Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", please indicate > > support for one of the two proposed methods: > > > > FASTv2 > > or > > EAP-Team > > > ... > > Thursday April 14. That gives us 2 weeks, which is usual for a > > consensus call. > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
