Joe Salowey wrote: >> 1. Do you agree with the direction taken in draft-ietf-emu-chbind-07. More >> specifically the usage of a channel binding specific TLV, the support of >> multiple name spaces, and that the server indicates to the client what >> attributes were validated.
Yes. >> 2. Two encoding method where described in IETF-80 in the following >> presentation http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/emu-1.pdf. Do you >> prefer encoding option 1, where attributes are encoded individually or >> option 2 where attributes in the same namespace are grouped together. (2). Speaking as an individual contributor. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
