Since we have reached WG consensus on the method, can the authors of
draft-zhou-emu-eap-fastv2-00.txt
please re-submit the document as:
draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-00.txt
The reason for the name change is that there have been questions
raised about whether this document should be left as EAP-FASTv2, or
whether it should request allocation of a new EAP type.
Since the document name (individual draft) currently reflects the EAP
type name, abstracting that would be useful. That way the document name
will not change no matter what the WG decides to do.
Anyone with opinions either way is requested to discuss the pros and
cons of the issue.
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
