Jouni: Thanks for the suggestions. We will update that in the next draft.
On 9/26/12 10:24 AM, "Jouni Malinen" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 06:55:48PM +0000, Hao Zhou (hzhou) wrote: >> Thanks for the review. Good catch on both. We will fix both of them. > >What is the new Label for TLS Keying Material Exporter? "teap >session key seed"? If so, is there any reason to not follow the >recommended prefix for new uses as defined in RFC 5705 (see the relevant >text below)? > > Labels here have the same definition as in TLS, i.e., an ASCII string > with no terminating NULL. Label values beginning with "EXPERIMENTAL" > MAY be used for private use without registration. All other label > values MUST be registered via Specification Required as described by > RFC 5226 [RFC5226]. Note that exporter labels have the potential to > collide with existing PRF labels. In order to prevent this, labels > SHOULD begin with "EXPORTER". This is not a MUST because there are > existing uses that have labels which do not begin with this prefix. > >I would have expected to see something like "EXPORTER: teap session key >seed" used as the Label for EAP-TEAP. > > >Should the IANA Considerations section have somewhat more formal >language to request registration of the new exporter label? > > TEAP makes use of the TLS Keying Material Exporters defined in > [RFC5705]. The Label used in the derivation as defined in > Section 5.1 is "teap seesion key seed". > > >Maybe something like this: > >TEAP registers the label "EXPORTER: teap session key seed" in the TLS >Exporter Label Registry. This label is used in derivation as defined in >Section 5.1. > >-- >Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
