Noticed the following:
draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-04 defines the key hierarchy as
Type-Code = 0x0D
Key_Material = TLS-Exporter("EXPORTER_EAP_TLS_Key_Material",
Type-Code, 128)
IV = TLS-Exporter("EXPORTER_EAP_TLS_IV",
Type-Code, 64)
Method-Id = TLS-Exporter("EXPORTER_EAP_TLS_Method-Id",
Type-Code, 64)
Session-Id = Type-Code || Method-Id
But section 1.4 of RFC 5247 defines Session-Id as
Session-Id = Type-Code || Method-Id
or
Session-Id = 0xFE || Vendor-Id || Vendor-Type || Method-Id
The definition in draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-04 does not seem compatible with
extended EAP types.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
