Noticed the following: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-04 defines the key hierarchy as
Type-Code = 0x0D Key_Material = TLS-Exporter("EXPORTER_EAP_TLS_Key_Material", Type-Code, 128) IV = TLS-Exporter("EXPORTER_EAP_TLS_IV", Type-Code, 64) Method-Id = TLS-Exporter("EXPORTER_EAP_TLS_Method-Id", Type-Code, 64) Session-Id = Type-Code || Method-Id But section 1.4 of RFC 5247 defines Session-Id as Session-Id = Type-Code || Method-Id or Session-Id = 0xFE || Vendor-Id || Vendor-Type || Method-Id The definition in draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-04 does not seem compatible with extended EAP types. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu