There have been several reviews of different aspects of this draft in the past:
Jim provided a complete review here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/ZDwpgyOL5eBPgyOGwXqxj1VhX-4 A discussion about the L-bit and fragmentation here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/ZexFr7GROnvNOjN6gGESoO9H0dk Fairly long discussion on session resumption here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/LgGAtWVLZsiog13OZRVIFbOZqv4 Implementation report here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/fTnE46aKnAxhfx38Od-7carTKjI It would still help the chairs and the document shepherd if folks on the list can be a little more proactive and provide comments/feedback on working group documents. If you have previously read the document and feel that it is ready, then confirming that on the list helps. Having wider community review/input and consensus building is core to the work we do at the IETF. It would be sad to ship documents to the IESG with limited or no review/feedback from the working group! --Mohit On 6/27/19 7:16 AM, Joseph Salowey wrote: The Working Group last call has completed with no comments for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-05. I would like to confirm that some working group members have reviewed the draft. If you have reviewed the draft please respond to this thread. THanks, Joe _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org<mailto:Emu@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
