> On 7 Oct 2019, at 15:10, Alan DeKok <al...@deployingradius.com> wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:32 AM, John Mattsson 
> <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote:
>>> Is the current published version up to date with the rest of the comments?
>> Yes, to my knowledge, the current draft handles all the other comments. If 
>> we decide to leave EAP-TLS PSK discussions for another draft, I think 
>> draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-07 is ready to move forward in the publication 
>> process.
>  I agree.
>  My one worry is that if we update EAP-TLS without also updating PEAP and 
> TTLS, then bad things will happen.
>  My $0.02 is to remove the discussion of FAST and TEAP from 
> draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types, as the remaining items are not controversial.  
> The document should then be published simultaneously with the EAP-TLS updates.

If we evolve draft-lear-eap-teap-brski into a more generic TEAP update we could 
cover TLS 1.3 there.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Emu mailing list

Reply via email to