On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Well. I am referring to the text from the RFC 3579: "In order to avoid > retransmissions by the peer, the Access-Reject SHOULD include an > EAP-Response/Nak packet indicating no preferred method, encapsulated > within EAP-Message attribute(s)."
Ah, OK. > It is clear that hostap does not (yet) > implement this SHOULD. I suspect that FreeRADIUS doesn't either. Maybe > that's because it needs to allow role reversal (i.e. peer sending an > EAP-Request) for LEAP? Yes. TBH, it's 2020. I'll just go delete support for LEAP. There's just no reason to allow it to be used. I'll also add the NAK in the access-Reject as per RFC 3579. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
