Hi Folks, I realize that there is frustration with the current document and process. I ask that we all focus on finishing off the current document so that we can move it forward. This does require that we consider the issues on the table. I think we are close to the finish line. I am asking the authors to help work through the final issues.
Please continue to remain professional in your discussions on the list. Thanks, Joe On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:33 AM Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 11, 2021, at 12:20 PM, Mohit Sethi M <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I find it odd that you claim your suggestions have been ignored or > rejected. > > So -16 does address my review from May 6? Could you please go through > my review of today, and point out in -16 where each of my comments was > addressed? > > As a reminder, many of those comments go back to my earlier review of > -13 on March 13. So we now have -14, -15, and -16 which (so far as I can > tell) don't address substantial portions of the reviews. > > > We have created many issues on github ( > https://github.com/emu-wg/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+Alan) > and submitted many pull requests addressing your comments ( > https://github.com/emu-wg/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13/pulls?q=is%3Apr+Alan+is%3Aclosed). > > > > > When I merged this PR in the morning: > https://github.com/emu-wg/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13/pull/71, it looked > like all of your comments had been addressed in the PR. Joe (the other > co-chair) had approved this PR? > > I had sent a review of -13 on March 3. And another one May 6. And > another today. The second and third reviews were largely copied from the > first one. And contained issues which (so far as I can tell) have not been > addressed, much less discussed. These issues do not appear to be addressed > in that PR. > > > As authors of a working group document of a voluntary standards > organization, we have been doing voluntary service over the last several > years. We started working on this document in 2018 ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mattsson-eap-tls13). You have > been helping us with the document since the beginning. So thank you for > your voluntary service as well. While it is not mandatory, helping us with > github issues/PRs related to your reviews can help us ensure that your > comments are not inadvertently left unaddressed; and that this community > effort moves forward faster. > > I'm asking that my reviews be discussed and/or addressed, by the > authors, in the WG. I didn't expect to get that particular response. It > is distinctly unusual. > > Alan DeKok. > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu >
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
