Hi Zahed, Thanks for reviewing. Answers in-line.
--Mohit On 10/7/21 3:08 PM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker wrote: > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-20: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for working on this specification. This is certainly an important > improvement. > > I will have to acknowledge the observations form other reviewers about the > diff > style updates in the specifications and the potential consequences of that. > However, I believe the working group have considered other alternatives and > made a decision that suits better for the purpose. > > I also support Francesca's observation about appendix A. It would be good be > clear about the reference updates. John has updated Appendix A: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-21#appendix-A, > > One nit - both Wi-Fi and WiFi are used in this document. I would suggest to > stick with Wi-Fi. > Fixed. > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
