On Jan 24, 2022, at 11:20 PM, Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: > > We are requesting a session at IETF 113. There has not been a whole lot of > discussion on the list of any topic. Before scheduling an interim we would > like to understand what the topics would be. > > Do we need an interim for EAP-Types or is it ready for last call?
I think it's as ready as it's going to be. PEAP / TTLS is tested by multiple clients and servers. There's been less feedback on FAST / TEAP. So either it's correct, or it's not relevant. > What is the working group interested in meeting on? There's not a lot left which is critical, I think. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
