Thanks for the nudge on this. We just issued the WGLC for this document. Please send your reviews on that thread.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 5:40 AM Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > There has been nothing preventing anyone from reviewing the document at > any time in the last year. Since all of the implementors are happy with > the document, and there are multiple inter-operable implementations, it's > time to issue a WGLC, and publish it. > > I'm happy to fix any minor issues in the document as a result of > reviews. But as a matter of process, it seems very broken to me we require > a WGLC in order for people to review a WG document. This seems like a very > problematic change in the IETF process. > > Alan DeKok. > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu >
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
