> On Dec 23, 2022, at 6:07 AM, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: > I don't see TEAPv2 as much more than functioning TEAPv1. But if there are > people out there who have a functioning TEAPv1, and we have tested against > other vendors, we will hear from ALL of them if we break something. That is- > I don't want your document to be much longer than it already is.
I think there are enough vendors behind the current implementation that we should be OK. Supplicants: Microsoft, wpa_supplicant (eventually to be in Android). Servers: Cisco ISE, Aruba Clearpass Up and coming: Radiator, FreeRADIUS. Apple is as usual, unknown. I think that covers a large part of the market. Anyone who isn't in the above list either hasn't written a TEAP implementation yet, or hasn't tested their implementation against the market leaders. So I'm willing to say we're OK, and we can go ahead with 7170-bis, as TEAPv1. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
