On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 16:24, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2023, at 8:00 PM, Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: > > [Joe] Speaking as a contributor, I would rather see the text deleted if > > no-one plans on implementing it. This would make the document simpler. > > If no one objects in the next week or so, I'll go do that. > > My suggestion is to delete all text on PAC, and on related attributes. The > IANA registries can remain in place, but the TLVs related to PAC can point to > RFC 7170, and the other TLVs can point to this document.
I also support deleting the PAC related parts. That would make it clearer which parts of TEAP remain in active use. -- Heikki Vatiainen [email protected] _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
