Based on helpful WGLC feedback on draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis, we are now at
version -14. I'm not aware of any outstanding issues (minor errata stuff
aside) and there do not appear to be any objections, sustained or otherwise
at the present time. On that basis, your EMU WG chairs are declaring WG
consensus in support of draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-14.
Thank you to everyone who took the time to read through the draft and
comment during WGLC. I genuinely believe the process has improved the
document. Joe and I look forward to its passage through IETF LC and onto
publication.
Joe and Peter
From: pe...@akayla.com <pe...@akayla.com>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 2:23 PM
To: 'emu@ietf.org' <emu@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-11
Folks,
Alan has issued -11 of draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis. He
believes it covers all of the outstanding issues that needed to be resolved.
We held up the WGLC until we could have our session at IETF 117. With
post-117 changes incorporated, now's seems like the time for the WGLC to go
forward. Please post your comments to the mailing list by August 28th. Even
a "good to go" is genuinely helpful input.
Thanks.
Joe and Peter
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
