Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for this document, and also to Bo Wu for the OpsDir review:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-10-opsdir-lc-wu-2023-03-20/

I'll note that the document was updated 10 July 2023, after the OpsDir review
(10 March 2023), but the (IMO) very reasonable suggestions were not taken:
"With only IETF technical background, it seems more readable if UICC, HSS can
expand on the first-time use."

I hope / trust the the authors will consider and address these.



_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to