I have read this document multiple times, and when it is published as an RFC it will clearly meet the requirements for “Specification Required”.
I have looked over the proposed registries and values, and they properly reflect the allocations in this document. So, I approve this allocation. However, because of the fundamental nature, large number and complexity of these initial allocations, I think we should also wait for Nancy’s review before continuing. Best Regards, Margaret > On Mar 5, 2024, at 3:19 PM, David Dong via RT > <drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote: > > Dear Margaret Cullen and Nancy Cam-Winget (cc: emu WG), > > As the designated experts for the TEAP Error TLV (value 5) Error Codes > registry, can you review the proposed registration in > draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-15 for us? Please see > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis/ > > The due date is March 19. > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll > make the registration at: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/teap-parameters/ > > Please let us know if you would like for us to wait for both reviewers to > respond, or if one response is enough. > > With thanks, > > David Dong > IANA Services Sr. Specialist _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
