The following errata report has been verified for RFC7170,
"Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5845

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Jouni Malinen <j...@w1.fi>
Date Reported: 2019-08-24
Verified by: Paul Wouters (IESG)

Section: 3.3.1

Original Text
-------------
   EAP method messages are carried within EAP-Payload TLVs defined in
   Section 4.2.10.  If more than one method is going to be executed in
   the tunnel, then upon method completion, the server MUST send an
   Intermediate-Result TLV indicating the result.


Corrected Text
--------------
   EAP method messages are carried within EAP-Payload TLVs defined in
   Section 4.2.10.  Upon method completion, the server MUST send an
   Intermediate-Result TLV indicating the result.


Notes
-----
Description of whether Intermediate-Result TLV is supposed to be used in the 
case where only a single inner EAP authentication method is used. Section 3.3.1 
says "more than one method is going to be executed in the tunnel, then upon 
method completion, the server MUST send an Intermediate-Result TLV indicating 
the result", Section 3.3.3 says "The Crypto-Binding TLV and Intermediate-Result 
TLV MUST be included to perform cryptographic binding after each successful EAP 
method in a sequence of one or more EAP methods", 4.2.13 says "It MUST be 
included with the Intermediate-Result TLV to perform cryptographic binding 
after each successful EAP method in a sequence of EAP methods", Annex C.3 shows 
an example exchange with a single inner EAP authentication method with use of 
Intermediate-Result TLV.

It looks like the majority of the places discussion this topic implies that 
there is going to be an Intermediate-Result TLV after each inner EAP 
authentication method and the text in 3.3.1 is the only clear case of 
conflicting (or well, at least misleading if one were to claim it does not 
explicitly say MUST NOT for the one inner EAP authentication method case). As 
such, I'd conclude the Intermediate-Result TLV is indeed going to be exchanged 
after each EAP authentication method and the proposed text change to 3.3.1 
covers that.

--------------------------------------
RFC7170 (draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1
Publication Date    : May 2014
Author(s)           : H. Zhou, N. Cam-Winget, J. Salowey, S. Hanna
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : EAP Method Update
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to