This is a minor comment.

Section 6.1:

A peer supporting EAP-PPT MUST NOT send its username or any other permanent 
identifiers in the first and subsequent EAP-Response/Identity messages. The 
EAP-Response/Identity message MUST contain only realm portion in order to route 
the authentication request to the right EAP server. It is RECOMMENDED to 
eliminate the identity exchange altogether if the route is known through some 
other means.

  This text could be confusing.  Plus, I'm not sure that it's possible to 
eliminate the identity exchange.  I would suspect that empty identities could 
also have interoperability problems.

  The text could perhaps just say that the Identifier MUST be a realm-only NAI, 
e.g. @example.com

  Alan DeKok.

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list -- emu@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to emu-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to