Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > The previous revision of the TEAPv2 draft jumped through hoops trying > to tie the inner data to the Crypto-Binding TLV. After some discussion > with Russ and others, these steps aren't necessary.
okay.
> Instead, we can exchange some cryptographic binding in the first
> message from each party. Once that's done, we don't need to exchange
> the Crypto-Binding TLV in every message.
> We still know that the TLS tunnel is secure, and the protocol becomes
much simpler.
The document looks sane/complete enough for running code.
Adopt it, as I think the WG wants to go in the direction of not fixing v1,
but quickly spinning v2.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
