The discussion of these documents has been relatively quiet, but
reviews to the mailing list and comments during IETF meetings have been
addressed by the authors. Now the real proof of the pudding will be whether
the WG feels these documents are ready to advance. So, I have placed both in
WGLC that will end prior to the upcoming Vienna meeting.
I would really like to see robust responses on whether these
documents are ready to advance given the relative dearth of discussion
following their adoption. There's certainly a need for PQC versions of EAP
mechanisms, so if you believe these documents embody the right responses for
EAP-AKA' (FS), please make your voice heard by sending a message to the
mailing list and detailing why they are ready to move forward. Conversely,
if you think they are not ready, that's useful input as well, especially
when actionable input is provided.
Thank you in advance for your time and input.
-Peter
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
