13th session of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable 
Development  -  Issue #9 

EARTH NEGOTIATIONS BULLETIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR 
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (IISD) <http://www.iisd.org>

Written and edited by:

Twig Johnson, Ph.D. 
Amber Moreen 
Miquel Mu�oz 
Chris Spence 
Andrey Vavilov, Ph.D. 

Editor:

Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Director, IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Vol. 5 No. 226
Friday, 22 April 2005

Online at http://www.iisd.ca/csd/csd13/ 

CSD-13 HIGHLIGHTS: 

THURSDAY, 21 APRIL 2005

On Thursday, CSD-13's high-level segment focused on turning 
political commitments into action, starting with an interactive 
discussion involving representatives of UN organizations, regional 
commissions, specialized agencies and Bretton Woods Institutions. 
This was followed by presentations from invited speakers, 
statements from ministers and other high-level government 
officials, and an interactive session with Major Groups. Delegates 
also continued to negotiate the Chair's revised outcome document, 
meeting late into Thursday night.

HIGH-LEVEL SEGMENT

On Thursday, CSD-13's high-level segment resumed its focus on the 
issue of "Turning political commitments into action," with 
sessions focused on UN agencies and other organizations, country 
statements and discussions, and Major Groups. 

INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS WITH UN ORGANIZATIONS, REGIONAL 
COMMISSIONS, SPECIALIZED AGENCIES AND BRETTON WOODS INSTITUTIONS: 
FAO emphasized that without resources, and unless the Monterrey 
commitments are honored, the MDGs will not be achieved until the 
year 2150. WHO highlighted the need to address water and 
sanitation needs collectively while protecting ecosystems, and 
urged multisectoral, multistakeholder, and public-private 
initiatives. UNFPA underscored the centrality of population and 
gender issues, especially the basic right to family planning 
services, in addressing poverty. He called for recognition of the 
poor, young people and women as agents of change. UNICEF 
highlighted water and sanitation services as powerful means to 
break the cycle of poverty, observed that the lack of these 
services hinders education, and urged ministers to give particular 
prominence to school sanitation.

The UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE highlighted the regional 
dimension of efforts to achieve the MDGs. WMO underscored the 
importance of high-quality shared data, and proposed a goal of 
reducing by half the number of deaths from natural disasters over 
the next 15 years. UNCCD highlighted the importance of IWRM in 
programmes being developed to combat desertification, and the role 
of UNCCD Networks. OECD explained that, although ODA is now 
increasing, domestic financing will remain the primary source for 
all but the poorest countries. RAMSAR CONVENTION noted progress on 
IWRM and cooperative work with the Convention on Biological 
Diversity and other UN conventions and bodies. 

Responding to these comments, the US stressed the need to learn 
from successful experiences in using ODA to leverage domestic 
financing. GUYANA noted that domestic capital is being limited by 
decisions being taken in the WTO and other fora. PAKISTAN 
discussed the role of private investment in achieving the MDGs, 
suggesting that entrepreneurs should be encouraged to invest in 
small and medium enterprises (SMEs). FRANCE noted the benefits 
from having its national sustainable development strategy peer 
reviewed. Luxembourg, speaking for the EU, stressed the 
complementarity between MDGs and WSSD goals, and urged substantial 
replenishment of the GEF. 

UNEP stressed that environmental and ecosystem services are 
essential, and not a luxury. BRAZIL said sustainable development 
is sometimes being addressed primarily through its environmental 
pillar, and CSD is the right forum to address this problem. 

Reflecting on the discussion, Jose Antonio Ocampo, Under 
Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, noted comments 
on the importance of trade issues, support for public sector 
financing of water and sanitation services to the poor, and the 
use of cross-subsidization and bond markets as innovative tools. 

KEYNOTE SPEAKERS: Late on Thursday morning, delegates heard 
presentations on the theme of "Turning political commitments into 
action" from invited speakers.

Mikhail Gorbachev, Founding President, Green Cross International, 
stressed that debate on water privatization should not become a 
stumbling block to progress, adding that the MDGs are not 
voluntary but rather about the right of access. He called for an 
international binding instrument that would guarantee the right to 
water and provide a mechanism for its implementation. 

The other invited speaker, the Prince of Orange, was unable to 
attend. However, his speech was presented by a Dutch official, who 
called on donors to meet ODA commitments and suggested that 
local-level participation and an integrated, sustainable strategy 
to achieve the MDGs be considered as conditions for funding.

COUNTRY STATEMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS: On Thursday afternoon, 
ministers and other high-level government officials presented 
statements and engaged in discussions on the issue of "Turning 
political commitments into action." 

Many speakers stressed their commitment to achieving the relevant 
internationally-agreed goals and targets, and shared experiences 
on domestic reforms. SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO, CHINA, BRAZIL, LAOS, 
ISRAEL, the RUSSIAN FEDERATION and others elaborated on their 
national sustainable development strategies. AUSTRALIA said 
achieving the MDGs requires economic growth, primarily driven by 
private investment and an enabling environment. BARBADOS 
emphasized good governance, partnerships, technology transfer, use 
of critical data, and increased ODA. 

FINLAND supported strengthened international environmental 
governance, and BELGIUM drew attention to the Network of Regional 
Governments for Sustainable Development. BRAZIL highlighted the 
need to review debt conditionalities, and CHINA, LAOS and the 
RUSSIAN FEDERATION underscored the challenges of urbanization. 
ESTONIA stressed cross-sectoral integration, particularly energy 
and agriculture, in water management. The EC highlighted an 
integrated approach to river basin management and the need for 
sustainable consumption and production patterns. PORTUGAL said 
governments must provide the private sector with clear rules. The 
GLOBAL WATER PARTNERSHIP stressed that action must shift from the 
international to the regional and subregional levels. 

ST. KITTS AND NEVIS noted the need to address debt issues, and 
said that to disregard CSD-13's themes is to disregard basic human 
rights. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO stressed the need for 
environmentally-friendly technologies. LESOTHO, MOROCCO and SOUTH 
AFRICA highlighted the important role of the CSD-13 themes in 
development. MOROCCO also appealed for support for the New 
Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD). SOUTH AFRICA 
underscored Africa's "special needs" and urged increased funding 
with less restrictive disbursement procedures. ZAMBIA called for 
debt relief, placing human settlements at the center of the 
development agenda, and long-term financing.

CANADA supported strengthened UN inter-agency coordination, 
highlighting the role of UN Water. ARMENIA urged broader 
international cooperation on regional IWRM. The DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 
called for a change in the development paradigm, and an increase 
in international aid for development. TUVALU, on behalf of several 
Pacific Island States, proposed devoting a minimum of one day in 
each future review session to review progress on the Mauritius 
Strategy. JAPAN elaborated on its international assistance for 
water projects. The CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC highlighted the 
relevance of CSD's themes to rural populations, COSTA RICA 
underscored the issue of payment for environmental services, and 
NIGERIA called for developed countries to provide debt relief 
and swaps. 

INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS WITH MAJOR GROUPS: On Thursday afternoon, 
an interactive discussion was held with Major Groups. WOMEN called 
for a rights-based approach, and noted that achieving the 
sanitation target requires infrastructure, behavioral change, and 
social empowerment. CHILDREN AND YOUTH urged changes in 
unsustainable consumption and production patterns and noted that 
youth-led projects are innovative, resourceful and cost-effective. 
Indigenous PEOPLE called for recognition of the right to 
self-determination in the CSD-13 outcome document.

Responding to these statements, a number of countries, including 
the EU, NORWAY, SWEDEN and BRAZIL supported Major Groups' 
integration and participation in CSD, while others discussed 
national initiatives and projects. CAPE VERDE, SWEDEN and others 
highlighted the need to strengthen and support women's role in 
environmental issues. EGYPT emphasized the need to mainstream 
environmental concerns and simplify donor processes. NORWAY said 
the contentious issue at CSD-13 was the rights-based approach, 
predicting that it would gain acceptance over time.

LOCAL AUTHORITIES and NORWAY supported decentralization of 
responsibilities and resources. NGOs urged a rights-based, 
pro-poor approach, scaled-up assistance, unconditional debt 
cancellation, fair trade, and a UN-based follow-up mechanism on 
targets and plans. TRADE UNIONS highlighted worker participation, 
decent jobs, and workplace health and safety as fundamental for 
sustainable development, and encouraged countries to take 
advantage of ILO technical assistance programmes. SENEGAL 
supported CSD's role in coordinating monitoring on policies 
and actions.

BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY underscored, inter alia, that "business does 
not support privatization of water resources," highlighting 
provision of water and sanitation services as a public service, 
whether operated by public or private entities. The SCIENTIFIC AND 
TECHNOLOGICAL COMMUNITY stressed the need for information and data 
collection with open access. FARMERS underscored the need to 
enhance the role of all stakeholders equally. SOUTH AFRICA 
expressed concern that the conference space provided at UNHQ has 
constrained Major Groups' participation. 

NEGOTIATIONS ON THE CHAIR'S REVISED TEXT

Informal small-group negotiations on CSD-13's draft outcome 
document continued on Thursday, on the basis of the updated 
Chair's text that had been issued late on Wednesday. One group 
dealt with the preamble and non-thematic sections, and another 
addressed thematic issues. Further progress was reported, but no 
final resolution had been reached as of 9:00 pm Thursday night.

PREAMBLE AND NON-THEMATIC SECTIONS: Negotiations in this group 
continued throughout the day. Future CSD procedures and timelines 
for follow-up review were debated early in the day. Several 
paragraphs of the preambular section were approved ad referendum, 
but less progress was made on the operative part, where only the 
first paragraph was agreed by Thursday evening. Several items in 
the second operative paragraph were discussed at length, but 
remained unresolved by the evening. Among the contentious issues 
was the question of the "user-friendly" (or "Chair's") matrix that 
would summarize policy options and practical measures; the 
matrix's status was questioned by the G-77/CHINA. 

The EU, US and G-77/CHINA expressed preferences for three 
different alternative texts on increased ODA and other resources. 
In addition, disagreements persisted on language dealing with the 
complementarity of the JPOI goals and MDGs. Good governance proved 
to be another contentious issue, with the G-77/CHINA insisting on 
mentioning the international level, and the US objecting to this. 
Alternative language that would refer to "improved governance at 
all levels" was also considered. Opposing views were expressed on 
the need for decentralization, with the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
insisting on dropping relevant text.   

THEMATIC ISSUES: In the group on thematic issues, suggested 
references to the "ecosystems approach" in the sub-section on IWRM 
proved contentious, with the EU and others in favor, and the 
G-77/CHINA against. Concerns in the G-77/CHINA over a reference 
to cost recovery were eventually resolved when language was added 
noting that cost recovery would not be a barrier to the poor's 
access to water. There were also disagreements on text dealing 
with cooperation among riparian states, with some countries 
opposing the use of JPOI language. 

IN THE CORRIDORS

"A tale of two CSDs" is how one participant described events on 
Thursday. With participants torn between the formal discussions in 
plenary and the informal negotiations, some smaller delegations 
were complaining that it was proving almost impossible to support 
their ministers in the plenary while also participating in 
negotiations on CSD-13's outcome document-talks that are now well 
past their original Tuesday deadline.  

The pressure was perhaps best reflected in the afternoon, when at 
one point all members of the Bureau were involved in informal 
negotiations, resulting in a delay in starting the plenary. 

Meanwhile, some observers were talking about concerns among Major 
Groups and UN agencies about their degree of involvement in the 
decision-making process.




This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin � <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is 
written and edited by Twig Johnson, Ph.D., Amber Moreen, Miquel 
Mu�oz, Chris Spence, and Andrey Vavilov, Ph.D. The Digital Editor 
is Leila Mead. The Editor is Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and the Director of IISD Reporting Services is 
Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Sustaining 
Donors of the Bulletin are the Government of the United States of 
America (through the Department of State Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs), the 
Government of Canada (through CIDA), the Swiss Agency for 
Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), the United Kingdom 
(through the Department for International Development - DFID), the 
Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of Germany 
(through the German Federal Ministry of Environment - BMU, and the 
German Federal Ministry of Development Cooperation - BMZ), the 
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the European 
Commission (DG-ENV). General Support for the Bulletin during 2005 
is provided by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 
the Government of Australia, the Austrian Federal Ministry of 
Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, the 
Ministry of Sustainable Development and the Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs of Sweden, the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of 
Foreign Affairs of Norway, the Ministry of Environment and the 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, Swan International, the 
Japanese Ministry of Environment (through the Institute for Global 
Environmental Strategies - IGES) and the Japanese Ministry of 
Economy, Trade and Industry (through the Global Industrial and 
Social Progress Research Institute - GISPRI), and the Italian 
Ministry of Environment. Funding for translation of the Earth 
Negotiations Bulletin into French has been provided by the 
International Organization of the Francophonie (IOF) and the 
French Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Funding for the translation of 
the Earth Negotiations Bulletin into Spanish has been provided by 
the Ministry of Environment of Spain. The opinions expressed in 
the Earth Negotiations Bulletin are those of the authors and do 
not necessarily reflect the views of IISD or other donors. 
Excerpts from the Earth Negotiations Bulletin may be used in 
non-commercial publications with appropriate academic citation. 
For information on the Bulletin, including requests to provide 
reporting services, contact the Director of IISD Reporting 
Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, +1-646-536-7556 or 212 East 47th St. 
#21F, New York, NY 10017, USA. The ENB Team at CSD-13 can be 
contacted by e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

---
You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to Linkages Update to receive our fortnightly, html-newsletter on 
what's new in the international environment and sustainable development arena: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm
- Archives of Climate-L and Climate-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/climate-L.htm
- Archives of Water-L and Water-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/water-L.htm

Reply via email to