Climate Technology Initiative Industry Joint Seminar on Successful 
Cases of Technology Transfer in Asian Countries  -  Final Summary      

CTI TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SEMINAR BULLETIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT (IISD) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Written and edited by:

Miquel Muñoz 
Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa, Ph.D. 

Editor:

Andrew Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

Director of IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 

Volume 92, Number 5
Saturday, 11 March 2006

Online at: http://www.iisd.ca/ymb/ctiijs/ 

CLIMATE TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE INDUSTRY JOINT SEMINAR ON SUCCESSFUL 
CASES OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN ASIAN COUNTRIES: 

8-9 MARCH 2006

The Climate Technology Initiative (CTI) Industry Joint Seminar on 
Successful Cases of Technology Transfer in Asian Countries took 
place from 8-9 March 2006 at the Daewoo Hotel, Hanoi, Vietnam. 
Organized by the CTI in cooperation with the Ministry of Natural 
Resources and Environment of Vietnam, the seminar was attended by 
144 participants from 11 Asian countries. The seminar provided an 
opportunity for government representatives, policymakers, and 
experts from industry, financial institutions and academia to 
review best practices for technology transfer in the Asian region, 
with particular focus on case studies on energy efficiency, 
renewable energies, and project financing. The objectives of the 
seminar were to identify key success factors for technology 
transfer in the region, and explore possibilities for the 
diffusion of best practices. The seminar also sought to identify 
financial instruments other than the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean 
Development Mechanism (CDM) for financing climate technology 
transfer.

During the day and a half long meeting, participants heard 
case-study presentations organized in three thematic sessions, 
and participated in one panel discussion. On Wednesday, two 
thematic sessions were held on energy efficiency and on 
renewable energy technologies. On Thursday, one thematic 
session was held on project financing. A panel discussion on 
cooperation among key sectors for technology transfer was also 
held.

This report provides a brief history of the climate change 
process, technology transfer and the CTI Industry Joint Seminar 
series, followed by a summary of the CTI Industry Joint Seminar on 
Successful Cases of Technology Transfer in Asian Countries.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, AND 
CTI INDUSTRY JOINT SEMINARS

THE UNFCCC AND THE KYOTO PROTOCOL: Climate change is one of the 
most serious threats to sustainable development, with adverse 
impacts expected on human health, food security, economic 
activity, the environment, water and other natural resources, as 
well as physical infrastructure. The international political 
response to climate change took shape in 1992 with the adoption of 
the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The UNFCCC 
sets out a framework for action aimed at stabilizing atmospheric 
concentrations of greenhouse gases in order to avoid “dangerous 
anthropogenic interference” with the climate system. Controlled 
gases include methane, nitrous oxide and, in particular, carbon 
dioxide. The UNFCCC entered into force in March 1994, and now has 
189 Parties.

In December 1997, delegates met in Kyoto, Japan, and adopted the 
Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC that commits developed countries and 
countries with economies in transition to achieve quantified 
emissions reduction targets. These countries agreed to reduce 
their overall emissions of six greenhouse gases by an average of 
5.2% below 1990 levels between 2008 and 2012 (the first commitment 
period), with specific targets varying from country to country. 
The Kyoto Protocol also establishes three flexible mechanisms to 
assist the parties in meeting their national targets cost-
effectively: an emissions trading system; joint implementation 
(JI); and the CDM, which encourages projects in developing 
countries. The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on 16 February 
2005 and has been ratified by 162 Parties.

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER UNDER THE UNFCCC AND THE KYOTO PROTOCOL: 
Technology transfer is considered a key element in combating 
climate change under the UNFCCC. Article 4.5 of the Convention 
addresses technology transfer, stating that “developed 
countries…shall take all practicable steps to promote, facilitate 
and finance, as appropriate, the transfer of, or access to, 
environmentally-sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, 
particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to 
implement the provisions of the Convention.” Article 10c of the 
Kyoto Protocol contains a similar commitment.

In 2001, Parties to the UNFCCC adopted a framework for actions to 
enhance the implementation of Article 4.5. The framework contains 
five key activities relating to technology needs assessments, 
technology information, enabling environments, capacity building 
and mechanisms for technology transfer. Funding to implement the 
framework is provided through the Global Environment Facility 
climate change focal area and the Special Climate Change Fund. The 
CDM is also expected to contribute to the transfer of cleaner and 
more efficient technologies to developing countries.

Parties to the UNFCCC took further action in 2001 by establishing 
an Expert Group on Technology Transfer (EGTT) to help advance the 
Convention’s technology-related goals. Since then, workshops have 
been held on technology information (Beijing, China, April 2002), 
needs assessments (Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 2002), enabling 
environments (Ghent, Belgium, April 2003), and innovative 
financing (Montreal, Canada, September 2004 and Bonn, Germany, 
October 2005), and adaptation technologies (Tobago, June 2005).

At the eleventh Conference of the Parties (COP-11) to the UNFCCC, 
serving as the first Meeting of the Parties (MOP-1) to the Kyoto 
Protocol, held in Montreal in November-December 2005, delegates, 
inter alia: endorsed EGTT’s 2006 Work Programme; requested a side 
event on the issue of public technologies; took note of pilot 
networking between UNFCCC’s Technology Transfer Clearing House and 
regional technology information centers; and asked the UNFCCC 
Secretariat to organize a high-level roundtable on lessons 
learned, technology deployment, transfer, cooperation and 
partnerships.

CTI INDUSTRY JOINT SEMINARS ON TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION: The Climate 
Technology Initiative is a multilateral initiative that was 
established in 1995 at the first Conference of the Parties to the 
UNFCCC, and operates as an Implementing Agreement under the 
International Energy Agency (IEA). Its mission is to bring 
countries together to foster international cooperation in order to 
accelerate the development and diffusion of climate-friendly and 
environmentally-sound technologies and practices. CTI works with 
the UNFCCC Secretariat and the EGTT, as well as relevant IEA 
Implementing Agreements and other international organizations and 
initiatives. Its activities are designed to be consistent with 
UNFCCC objectives, in particular the framework for technology 
transfer that was adopted at the seventh Conference of the Parties 
in Marrakesh, Morocco, 2001. The CTI has an ongoing programme of 
seminars and workshops designed to support the UNFCCC process and 
facilitate the diffusion of appropriate technologies and 
practices. The CTI also organizes a series of joint industry 
seminars. The first CTI Industry joint seminar for the Asia and 
Pacific Region was held in Beijing in May 1998.

Second CTI Industry Joint Seminar on Technology Diffusion in Asia: 
This seminar was held from 14-15 January 2000 in Cebu City, the 
Philippines. The seminar’s sessions covered: the UNFCCC and 
technology diffusion and transfer; lessons learned from existing 
projects in the Asia region; financing for climate change 
projects; information and capacity-building needs; the 
institutional environment; and practical steps to promote, 
facilitate and finance transfer of, and access to, 
environmentally-sound technologies and know-how.

CTI Industry Joint Seminar on Technology Diffusion in Eastern 
Europe and Central Asia: This seminar, organized by the CTI and 
the UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), in cooperation 
with the UNFCCC and the Austrian Government, was held in Vienna, 
Austria from 28-29 October 2003. The event sought to increase 
participants’ awareness of climate change and technology transfer 
issues, review experiences in the region, and promote 
environmentally-sound projects by encouraging collaboration 
between policymakers, technology transfer specialists, financial 
institutions, and the private sector. The seminar focused on: the 
status of technology transfer under the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol; 
the role of developed countries and multilateral and financial 
organizations in diffusing technology; and financial barriers.

CTI Industry Joint Seminar on Technology Diffusion in ASEAN and 
Small Island States in the Pacific Region: This seminar was held 
from 4-5 February 2004 in Jakarta, Indonesia. Organized by the CTI 
and the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development 
Organization (NEDO) in cooperation with the Indonesian Government 
and the UNFCCC, the seminar focused on clean energy and energy 
efficiency, as well as challenges experienced by governments, 
industry, academia and the finance sector in promoting technology 
transfer. The seminar’s sessions covered: government perspectives 
on strategies for the introduction of clean energy technologies; 
possibilities for private sector cooperation between developing 
and developed countries; financial barriers and the role of 
multilateral and financial institutions; and practical steps to 
promote and facilitate access to, and transfer of, clean energy 
technologies.

Second CTI Industry Joint Seminar on Technology Diffusion in 
Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent 
States: This seminar, organized by the CTI and UNIDO, was held in 
Vienna, Austria from 28-29 October 2004. Focusing on linkages 
between climate change and energy efficiency, the seminar reviewed 
best practices for the deployment of energy efficient technologies 
and considered how policies such as energy security, market reform 
and social and rural development can create incentives for 
improving energy efficiency. It also sought to identify major 
barriers to the diffusion of energy efficient technologies in 
Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent 
States.

CTI Industry Joint Seminar on Technology Diffusion of Energy 
Efficiency in Asian Countries: This seminar, organized by the CTI 
in cooperation with the Government of China and Tsinghua 
University, was held from 24-25 February 2005 in Beijing, China. 
The seminar addressed technical and policy options for improving 
energy efficiency in the transport, residential and industrial 
sectors. The objective of the seminar was to increase awareness of 
energy efficiency in Asian countries, discuss activities related 
to climate technology transfer, and provide insight on best 
practices, technology transfer policies, barriers, and the CDM.

CTI Joint Forum on Project Formation: This seminar, jointly 
organized by the CTI, the International Emissions Trading 
Association (IETA), and UNIDO, was held on 21 October 2005, in 
Madrid, Spain. The Forum brought together government and business 
representatives from countries engaging in Joint Implementation 
(JI) activities under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol and focused 
on the prospects and possibilities of JI in light of practical 
examples and experiences already gained. The seminar addressed 
legal definitions, country experiences and potential rules for the 
two JI tracks.

REPORT OF THE SEMINAR

The CTI Industry Joint Seminar on Successful Cases of Technology 
Transfer in Asian Countries began on Wednesday morning with 
opening speeches.

Nguyen Cong Thanh, Vice-Minister of Natural Resources and 
Environment, Vietnam, welcomed participants, highlighting that the 
seminar will strengthen the collaboration among Asian countries 
and international organizations in order to improve energy 
efficiency and promote renewable energy in Asian countries. 
Emphasizing that climate change is at the heart of global concern, 
he stressed the need for sharing best practices related to energy 
efficiency and renewable energy technologies.

Toshi Sakamoto, CTI Executive Committee and Ministry of Economy, 
Trade and Industry of Japan, outlined the origin, activities and 
accomplishments of the CTI, highlighting the CTI’s mission to 
encourage international cooperation in the development and 
diffusion of climate-friendly and environmentally-sound 
technologies and practices. Noting that the CTI has organized 
numerous events on technology diffusion and capacity building in 
every region of the world, he said that this seminar is different 
from the others since it focused on: disseminating successful case 
studies in energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies; 
identifying key success factors; and addressing financial aspects 
of technology transfer. 

Antonio Pflüger, International Energy Agency (IEA), presented the 
IEA’s activities, noting that the IEA is an integral part of its 
members’ energy security, conducts policy analysis, convenes 
expertise, and publishes findings and shares them within the 
energy community. He highlighted that Implementing Agreements 
under the IEA, one of which is the CTI, are strictly demand-
driven. He also said that future activities of the IEA will focus 
on extending the partnership and involvement of non-member 
countries in Implementing Agreements and promoting international 
networks for energy research and development.

SESSION I: CASE STUDIES OF ENERGY EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES

This session was moderated by Antonio Pflüger, IEA, and included 
case-study presentations on motor system optimization in China, 
coke dry quenching in China, and energy efficiency at a brewery in 
Vietnam. Following the presentations, participants from China, 
India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam 
commented on the presentations and shared their own country 
experiences. 

Robert Williams, UNIDO, presented on motor system optimization 
experiences, UNIDO’s training programme in China, and on system 
standards. He underscored the need to focus on system efficiency 
rather than component efficiency, noting that a system with highly 
efficient components can have low overall efficiencies. Regarding 
UNIDO’s training programme in China, Williams said that the focus 
was to develop capability to analyze industrial energy systems, 
rather than offering “ready made” solutions. He drew attention to 
the cross-cutting nature of training, noting that training is not 
specific to particular sectors or industrial processes, and said 
that the training programme in China resulted in identification of 
nearly 40 million kWh in energy savings. He said lessons learned 
include that training is resource intensive and that transferred 
knowledge resides in individuals who might eventually leave thus 
jeopardizing its continuity. Williams outlined barriers to 
efficiency and proposed a system energy-efficiency standard 
approach. He said UNIDO is developing documentation to be made 
available online in an ISO-friendly format so that it can be 
inserted into the documentation of factories seeking ISO 14000. 
He also said that incorporating energy efficiency into ISO 
certification provides the industry with incentives to act. 
Participants raised questions regarding mandatory energy audits, 
system maintenance and potential areas for energy savings.

Teruo Okazaki, Nippon Steel Corporation of Japan, described energy 
saving initiatives in the steel industry, highlighting Japan Iron 
and Steel Federation’s (JISF) voluntary initiatives, which focus 
on energy saving in production processes, utilization of waste 
energy and materials, and international cooperation through 
technology transfer. He outlined Nippon Steel’s contribution to 
the Carbon Fund and participation in CDM projects as a 
contribution to greenhouse gas emissions reductions on a global 
scale through technology transfer. He then presented experiences 
of a NEDO energy saving model project for coke dry quenching 
facilities in China. Okazaki highlighted that technology transfer 
within the steel industry leads to a large reduction in carbon 
dioxide emissions on a global scale and that the CDM is a powerful 
tool for accelerating technology transfer. In the ensuing 
discussion, participants asked questions on the calculation of 
energy costs for coke production.

Sigeru Sakashita, Mayekawa Company Limited, Japan, presented on 
the CDM project to increase efficiency in Bia Thanh Hoa brewery in 
Vietnam. He underlined some of the problems addressed in the 
project, such as inefficient coal boilers, use of large quantities 
of water, no wastewater treatment and high electricity consumption. 
He noted that coal is very cheap in Vietnam and thus provides no 
incentives for energy savings. Sakashita outlined in technical 
detail four proposed improvements and their benefits, including 
vapor re-compression (VCR) steam recovery systems, improved 
refrigeration, optimized pasteurization, and biogas boiler. He 
then specified three aspects of technology transfer in this 
project, including hardware, software, and group activity, and 
underscored dissemination possibilities to other industries, 
such as VCR to distilleries and sugar plants, refrigeration to 
dairy plants, optimized pasteurization to soft drinks, and biogas 
to all industries with wastewater. Participants raised questions 
on economic efficiency and CDM.

DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS: M.S. Shivarama, Essar Steel Limited, 
India, said that the Indian steel industry is mainly run by the 
government and large corporations, and that there exist national 
policies on steel, energy and environment, including on energy 
efficiency and environmentally-sound technologies. He noted that 
energy audits are mandated for designated energy consumers. Maryam 
Ayuni, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Indonesia, 
emphasized the importance of improving energy efficiency through 
system optimization, capacity building in energy management, and 
energy service company (ESCO) business. She also stressed the need 
for addressing financial barriers in technology transfer, and the 
importance of data and correct calculation for the CDM. Sutji 
Rahayu, Persero, Indonesia, underscored the limitations of power 
generation. Evelyn Bacud, Asia Brewery Incorporated, the 
Philippines, noted that biogas is corrosive and not readily 
suitable for distillation because of refining needs, and requested 
technical details on biogas use. Hamdan Mokhtar, Bioprocess 
Technology Centre SIRIM Berhad, Malaysia, underscored the 
importance of a good working model and the continuity of programs, 
including CDM. He noted that industry has to report to the 
government on energy consumption in Malaysia. Somkiat Sutiratana, 
Ministry of Energy, Thailand, expressed Thailand’s interest in 
applying these successful technologies and practices, and 
highlighted the need for foreign investment and assistance for 
technology transfer. Noting successful experiences of NEDO model 
projects in China, Huang Dao, China Iron and Steel Association, 
said that international cooperation is essential for technology 
transfer. Bui Huy Phung, Vietnam Academy of Science and 
Technology, highlighted Vietnam’s considerable achievements in 
energy efficiency in the past decade. Regarding motor system 
optimization, he sought detailed information on particular 
technologies and economic efficiency.

SESSION II: CASE STUDIES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES

This session was moderated by Ajay Mathur, Senergy Global Private 
Limited, India, and included case-study presentations on rice husk 
power generation in Thailand, biomass gasification for thermal 
applications in Myanmar, and wind power for rural electrification 
in China. Following the presentations, participants from China, 
Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam 
commented on the presentations and shared their own country 
experiences.

Natee Sithiprasasana, A.T. Biopower Company Limited, Thailand, 
presented on the Pichit rice husk power plant in Thailand. He 
explained that the project was a result of government policies to 
promote substitutes for fossil fuels and encourage the private 
sector to build, own and operate power plants. Sithiprasasana 
underscored the importance of sound technology in order to attract 
investment, and explained the operational details of the 22MW 
biomass power plant, including husk storage, suspension fire 
boiler technology, zero wastewater system and selling of ash as a 
byproduct to cement factories. He said the costs of the plant, at 
$US 1.5 million per MW of installed capacity, are higher than 
conventional plants, but that the extra cost is due to high 
environmental awareness in Thailand, and compensated by selling 
CDM credits and byproducts such as high-quality ash. 
Sithiprasasana highlighted the global and local benefits of the 
plant, as well as socio-economic aspects of the project, such as 
legally-binding contracts with the local community, establishment 
of compensation and environmental funds, and supervision by local 
community.

Questions were raised on the payback time, rice-husk supply, CDM 
and electricity price regulation. Sithiprasasana explained that 
contracts for rice husk supply were secured with 20 rice mills 
from the surrounding area, that tariffs for electricity from 
renewable energy sources are regulated in Thailand, and that CDM 
registration of the project is pending the approval of national 
regulations by government.

Sunil Dhingra, the Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), India, 
spoke on using modern biomass technologies as alternative to 
hydrocarbon fuels and existing conventional energy resources, 
highlighting TERI’s research activities on biomass gasification 
technology development. Presenting a successful demonstration of a 
biomass gasifier for thermal applications in the tobacco curing 
industry in Myanmar, he said that the use of a biomass gasifier, 
which uses local agricultural residue as its main input, provides 
opportunities for increased income for local communities, in 
addition to substantial environmental benefits. He noted that the 
use of biomass gasifiers can be further expanded to other 
applications, such as community cooking, sericulture and other 
small rural industries, as well as for providing electricity in 
remote rural areas. Following the presentation, participants 
discussed the possibility of using rice husks in biomass 
gasifiers, the energy efficiency and costs of biomass gasifiers, 
and technical requirements for biomass preparation.

Charlie Dou, Beijing Bergey Windpower Company Limited, presented 
on wind power technology and rural electrification in China. He 
said that around 29,000 villages and 70 million people are un-
electrified in China, noting differences in statistics depending 
on definitions. Dou said the Chinese National Township 
Electrification Program has the objective of electrifying 1000 
villages, and noted its successes so far, which include the 
electrification of more than 700 villages with wind power and 
photovoltaics. He underlined the importance of the programme for 
awareness rising, as a pull for the photovoltaic industry, and as 
a base for further dissemination of renewables. Dou also noted 
that the programme’s key challenges include maintaining renewable 
energy systems in operation at a sustainable cost, establishing 
rural energy service companies, setting tariffs for off-grid 
electricity, and developing quality standards. He then shared his 
company’s experiences on how to do business in China, underscoring 
the differences between cultural, social and legal systems.

DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS: Zhang Binliang, Administrative Centre for 
China’s Agenda 21, overviewed renewable energy use in China. 
Outlining national renewable energy policies, such as the 
Renewable Energy Law, he said that the use of renewable energy in 
China is expected to increase significantly, and called for 
technology transfer and financial support for promoting renewable 
energy. Hayat Sulaiman, Ministry of Industry, Indonesia, outlined 
Indonesia’s policy on renewable energies, in particular on 
encouraging industries to use bio-fuels as a substitute for fossil 
fuels. He described a rice husk power plant in the Sumatra 
province as a successful case of bio-fuel use that provides 
opportunities for job creation and additional energy for local 
communities. Chew Jit Seng, Malaysia Palm Oil Association, said 
that Indonesia’s renewable energy efforts focus on increasing the 
use of renewable energy in rural areas and plantations, and that 
industries look forward to more opportunities for renewable energy 
projects through the CDM. Maximino Marquez, Department of Energy, 
the Philippines, underscored seasonality of biomass as a problem 
for biomass power generation, and highlighted resource 
availability for renewable energies. He stressed the need to 
consider, inter alia, pro-poor criteria. Mont Uthaiphattrakul, 
Papop Company Limited, Thailand, highlghted methane production 
from agricultural waste, as well as the importance of the private 
sector engagement in technology transfer. Nguyen Tien Nguyen, 
Vietnam Science and Technology Academy, pointed out the need to 
consider competition factors for large-scale biomass, in 
particular competition for land use, food security and animal 
feedstock. He also underscored the different factors to be 
considered for grid-connected and off-grid renewable electricity 
projects.

Responding to questions and comments, Natee Sithiprasasana 
highlighted the importance of the site selection of a rice husk 
power plant in order to ensure a continuous supply of the biomass 
throughout the year. Sunil Dhingra said that the next stage of the 
biomass gasification project in Myanmar will focus on expanding 
the application of biomass gasification to other sectors, as well 
as engaging the private sector in technology transfer. Charlie Duo 
said that resource availability is crucial for renewable energy 
technology application.

SUMMARY OF DAY ONE PRESENTATIONS: Morihiro Kurushima, CTI 
Programme Manager, summarized the case-study presentations, noting 
their usefulness in learning from activities of industry, 
governments, international institutions and academia. He 
underscored the importance of industry participation in the 
seminar, saying that industry should be the main stakeholder in 
technology transfer. He noted that technology has no borders, but 
also that technologies are not generic, and that each country and 
region needs different technologies for their own specific 
circumstances. Kurushima also highlighted the function of CTI, and 
its role as a coordinator between industry, government, financial 
circles and academia.

SECTION III: PROJECT FINANCING

This session was moderated by Marina Ploutakhina, UNIDO, and 
included a presentation on financing technology transfer, followed 
by discussions and comments with participation of government, 
industry and academia representatives from China, the Philippines, 
India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam. 

Junji Hatano, Clean Energy Finance Committee of Mitsubishi UFJ 
Securities (MUS), Japan, presented on financing climate technology 
transfer. Noting that financing is one of the essential elements 
for technology transfer, he stressed that requisites for financing 
include reasonable return on investment and availability of funds. 
He said that the reasonable return can be secured by increasing 
the project’s profitability by monetizing its environmental value, 
highlighting ESCO CDM methodologies and CDM bundling as examples 
of such an approach. Emphasizing that a large number of projects 
with high profitability are still precluded from implementation 
due to lack of funding, Hatano noted that funds can be made 
available by means of dedicated financial instruments based on 
public-private partnership. As an example, he explained a 
financing scheme based primarily on private funding with partial 
funding from the public sector through seed money, co-financing, 
and indirect support by governments and international financial 
institutions. Regarding capital market opportunities, he 
emphasized channeling developed country “green” money to “green” 
projects in developing countries, and targeting environmentally 
conscious investors. Following the presentation, participants 
raised questions on programmatic CDM, CDM bundling, financial 
additionality, CDM reform and its continuation beyond 2012. 

DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS: Fun Ping, Ministry of Science and 
Technology, China, stressed the shortage of capital for 
investment, noting that potential project owners are unwilling to 
pay high transaction costs. He also underscored the need to reform 
the CDM in order to reduce transaction costs and make it simpler. 
Satya Suman Tak, Ministry of Steel, India, mentioned that two NEDO 
model projects are being implemented in India. Ajay Mathur, 
Senergy Global Private Limited, India, stressed the need for 
financing the replication and up-scaling of model projects. 
Highlighting risks associated with the novelty of technologies and 
management, he said that the use of partial risk guarantee schemes 
is important in order to reduce such risks. Franciscus M. 
Agustinus, PT Garudafood Putra Putri Jaya, Indonesia, shared 
Indonesia’s experience with government technical and financial 
support to the private sector for promoting energy efficiency. 
Alice Herrera, Department of Science and Technology, the 
Philippines, said that her country recognizes the importance of 
reducing greenhouse gas emissions, although there is no binding 
commitment under the Kyoto Protocol. She highlighted that with the 
introduction of the CDM, entrepreneurs’ interest in 
environmentally-friendly business has increased, but that there is 
still a low level of understanding of the CDM. She welcomed the 
concept of ESCO CDM methodology, and stressed the importance of 
choosing appropriate financing schemes and reducing transaction 
costs. Thanarat Worasute, Department of Industrial Works, 
Thailand, described a successful model project of biogas 
generation from wastewater treatment sludge. He said the project 
could be replicated at a larger scale. As an example of 
environmental project financing schemes he mentioned the Thailand 
Energy Conservation Fund. Nguyen Chi Quang, Hanoi University of 
Technology, Vietnam, stressed the importance of carefully 
identifying financial mechanisms appropriate to country-specific 
conditions. He highlighted the need for not only hardware 
transfer, but also for know-how transfer, and called for 
information dissemination in many languages.

PANEL DISCUSSION: COOPERATION AMONG KEY SECTORS FOR TECHNOLOGY 
TRANSFER

Toshi Sakamoto, CTI, moderated this panel discussion, which 
included six panelists from government, industry, financial sector 
and international organizations.

Antonio Pflüger, IEA, noted the increasing relevance of clean 
technologies in government policies and corporate strategies. He 
noted the great potential of renewable energies, but warned that 
renewable energies are considered a matter for environment 
ministers in many countries, and fail to get the attention of 
these ministers. He underscored that fossil fuels will remain a 
pillar of energy supply, noting IEA’s estimated expected $US 5 
trillion investment on power generation until 2025.

Robert Williams, UNIDO, noted that increased demand on energy 
efficiency in the last months is attributable to high energy 
prices. He underscored that energy efficiency is a continuous 
process, with a great potential for greenhouse gas reductions in 
the medium term (30 years). He said that high energy prices make 
many projects cost-effective, but that other barriers need to be 
overcome.

Ajay Mathur, Senergy Global Private Limited, underscored that the 
newness of technology, management and revenue collection for 
renewable energies inhibit their deployment. He stressed that 
investors adopt technologies only when the technology has been 
successfully deployed elsewhere. He pointed out three requirements 
for successful projects, including an appropriate product, 
appropriate policies and appropriate financing, and discussed the 
role of CDM for large and small projects, highlighting the 
importance of bundling for small projects.

Charlie Dou, Beijing Bergey Windpower Company Limited underscored 
the importance of operation, management and appropriate financing 
for renewable energies, highlighting training as essential. He 
underscored the need for national-level policies for technologies 
that do not qualify for CDM, noting that investors expect a 
reasonable return on investment.

Junji Hatano, Mitsubishi UFJ Securities Company Limited 
highlighted that CDM investors’ concern is shifting from project 
approval to project risks, including reliability of technology, 
capability of management and finance. He also underscored the role 
of renewable energies and energy efficiency in national energy 
security, as well as language barriers to CDM project development. 

Nguyen Khac Hieu, Ministry of Natural Resource and Environment, 
Vietnam, highlighted institutional arrangements, legal framework, 
and technical and finance barriers. He said host countries open up 
new opportunities for technology transfer and sustainable 
development by accepting the legal framework of CDM.

In the ensuing discussion, participants and panelists discussed 
CDM, information exchange, and energy dependence. It was noted 
that projects should be commercially viable and that the CDM 
should be considered the cherry on the cake. It was also noted 
that education and finance are both important and that they cannot 
replace one another.

CLOSING SESSION

Nguyen Khac Hieu, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 
Vietnam, highlighted that the seminar has provided the 
participants with a comprehensive review of successful cases of 
energy efficiency and renewable energy technology transfer, but 
that efforts still need to be taken to promote energy conservation 
in developing countries. Summarizing the presentations and 
discussions, he said that the seminar addressed a number of 
important issues, including the economic effectiveness and 
sustainability of projects. He thanked the CTI and participants 
for their contributions, which have made the seminar a successful 
gathering. 

Toshi Sakamoto, CTI Executive Committee, highlighted the broad 
participation of industry representatives in the seminar. He hoped 
that the seminar was useful in addressing, inter alia, policy 
implications and technical details of climate technology transfer. 
Closing the seminar, he thanked the Government of Vietnam for 
hosting the seminar, as well as speakers, moderators and 
participants for their contributions.

The meeting was closed at 1:02pm.

UPCOMING MEETINGS

WORKSHOP ON CLIMATE ADAPTATION CHALLENGES: BUILDING CAPACITY FOR 
AFRICAN BASED RESEARCH: This workshop is scheduled to take place 
from 26 - 28 March 2006, in Nairobi, Kenya. Participants will seek 
to support the capacity of African researchers, end users and 
stakeholders to identify key areas of future research on climate 
adaptation and to build capacity for climate adaptation. The event 
is organized by the Linking Climate Adaptation Network and will be 
hosted by the Institute of Development Studies the Africa Office 
of ActionAid International. For more information contact: Farhana 
Yamin, IDS; tel: +44-1273-606261; fax: +44-1273-621202; e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Internet: 
http://www.linkingclimateadaptation.org 

WORKSHOP ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: This 
workshop will be held from 7 - 8 April 2006, in New Delhi, India, 
and aims at exploring the linkages between climate change and 
sustainable development, and will report to CSD-14. It is 
organized by the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs and 
The Energy Research Institute (TERI), with the support of the 
Government of India. For more information contact: UN Division for 
Sustainable Development; tel: +1-212-963-8102; fax: +1-212-963-
4260; e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Internet: 
http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/sdissues/climate_change/climateChang
e_inter.htm 

TWENTY-FIFTH SESSION OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE 
CHANGE (IPCC): The Panel will meet from 26 - 28 April 2006, in 
Louis, Mauritius. The session will address, inter alia, the IPCC 
Programme and Budget for 2006 to 2009 and Draft Rules of 
Procedures for the Election of the IPCC Bureau and any Task Force 
Bureau, and will review the IPCC Terms of Reference. For more 
information contact: Rudie Bourgeois, IPCC Secretariat; tel: +41-
22-730-8208/84; fax: +41-22-730-8025/13; e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
Internet: http://www.ipcc.ch/meet/session25.htm 

FOURTEENTH SESSION OF THE UN COMMISSION ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 
(CSD-14): The Commission will meet from 1-12 May 2006, at the 
United Nations Headquarters in New York. The meeting will review 
progress on atmosphere/air pollution, climate change, energy and 
industrial development. For more information contact: UN Division 
for Sustainable Development; tel: +1-212-963-8102; fax: +1-212-
963-4260; e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Internet: 
http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/index.html 

CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE TECHNOLOGY: ENGINEERING CHALLENGES 
AND SOLUTIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY: This conference is scheduled to 
take place from 9 - 12 May 2006, in Ottawa, Canada, and aims to 
provide opportunities for engineers and others involved in climate 
change modeling, monitoring, mitigation, adaptation, education, 
investment and risk management to network and exchange views. For 
more information contact: John Grefford, Chair Organizing 
Committee; tel: +1-613-839-1108; fax: +1-613-839-1406; e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Internet: http://www.CCC2006.ca 

TWENTY-FOURTH SESSIONS OF THE SUBSIDIARY BODIES OF THE UN 
FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (SB-24): The twenty-fourth 
Sessions of the Subsidiary Bodies (SB-24) of the UN Framework 
Convention on Climate Change will take place in Bonn, Germany, 
from 15-26 May 2006. For more information contact: UNFCCC 
Secretariat; tel: +49-228-815-1000; fax: +49-228-815-1999; e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Internet: http://www.unfccc.int 

TWELFTH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE UNFCCC AND SECOND MEETING 
OF THE PARTIES TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL: UNFCCC COP 12 and Kyoto 
Protocol COP/MOP 2 will take place from 6-17 November 2006 in 
Nairobi, Kenya. These meetings will also coincide with the 25th 
meetings of the UNFCCC’s subsidiary bodies. For more information, 
contact: UNFCCC Secretariat; tel: +49-228-815-1000; fax: +49-228-
815-1999; e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; internet: 
http://www.unfccc.int




The CTI Technology Transfer Seminar Bulletin is a publication of 
the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, publishers of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin © 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This issue was written and edited by Miquel Muñoz 
and Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa, Ph.D. The Editor is Andrew Baldwin 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Director of IISD Reporting Services is 
Langston James “Kimo” Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Funding for 
coverage of this meeting has been provided by the International 
Center for Environmental Technology Transfer and the CTI Programme 
Secretariat. IISD can be contacted at 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th 
Floor, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0Y4, Canada; tel: +1-204-958-7700; 
fax: +1-204-958-7710. The opinions expressed in the Bulletin are 
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of 
IISD. Excerpts from the Bulletin may be used in other publications 
with appropriate academic citation. Electronic versions of the 
Bulletin are sent to e-mail distribution lists (ASCII and PDF 
format) and can be found on the Linkages WWW-server at 
<http://www.iisd.ca/>. For information on the Bulletin, including 
requests to provide reporting services, contact the Director of 
IISD Reporting Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, +1-646-536-7556 or 212 
East 47th St. #21F, New York, NY 10017, USA.

You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected] 
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to IISD Reporting Services' free newsletters and lists for 
environment and sustainable development policy professionals at 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm

Reply via email to