2nd Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on 
Persistent Organic Pollutants  -  Issue #1   

EARTH NEGOTIATIONS BULLETIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR 
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (IISD) <http://www.iisd.org>

Written and edited by:

Karen Alvarenga, Ph.D. 
Andrew Brooke 
Alexis Conrad 
Reem Hajjar 
Amber Moreen 

Editor:

Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Director of IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Vol. 15 No. 130
Monday, 1 May 2006

Online at http://www.iisd.ca/chemical/pops/cop2/ 

SECOND MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE STOCKHOLM 
CONVENTION: 

1-5 MAY 2006

The second Conference of the Parties (COP-2) to the Stockholm 
Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) convenes today 
at the Geneva International Conference Centre, in Geneva, 
Switzerland. The objective of this meeting is to adopt decisions 
related to: evaluation of the continued need for DDT for disease 
vector control and alternative strategies to replace DDT; criteria 
for the review process for entries in the register of specific 
exemptions; guidelines on best available techniques (BAT) and 
provisional guidance on best environmental practices (BEP); and 
identification and quantification of dioxin and furan releases. 
Other issues to be addressed by the COP include: guidance for 
national implementation plans; the Persistent Organic Pollutants 
Review Committee (POPRC) and relevant developments for action to 
be taken by the COP; guidance on technical assistance; regional 
and subregional centers for capacity building and transfer of 
technology; the report of the Global Environment Facility on its 
activities and other issues related to the financial mechanism; 
procedures and institutional mechanisms for determining non-
compliance and for treatment of Parties found to be in non-
compliance; issues relating to liability and redress; and adoption 
of the budget for the Secretariat. Other matters scheduled for 
discussion include enhancing synergies within the chemicals and 
waste cluster, and reviewing a study on improving cooperation and 
synergies between the secretariats of the Basel, Rotterdam and 
Stockholm Conventions.

The Stockholm Convention entered into force on 17 May 2004. The 
Convention currently has 122 parties, including 121 states and the 
European Community. 

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION 

During the 1960s and 1970s, the use of chemicals and pesticides in 
industry and agriculture increased dramatically. In particular, a 
category of chemicals known as POPs attracted international 
attention due to a growing body of scientific evidence indicating 
that exposure to very low doses of POPs can lead to cancer, damage 
to the central and peripheral nervous systems, diseases of the 
immune system, reproductive disorders and interference with normal 
infant and child development. POPs are chemical substances that 
persist, bioaccumulate in living organisms, and pose a risk of 
causing adverse effects to human health and the environment. With 
further evidence of the long-range transport of these substances 
to regions where they have never been used or produced, and the 
consequent threats they pose to the environment worldwide, the 
international community called for urgent global action to reduce 
and eliminate their release into the environment. 

In March 1995, the UNEP Governing Council (GC) adopted decision 
18/32 inviting the Inter-Organization Programme on the Sound 
Management of Chemicals (IOMC), the Intergovernmental Forum on 
Chemical Safety (IFCS) and the International Programme on Chemical 
Safety to initiate an assessment process regarding a list of 12 
POPs. In response, the IFCS convened an Ad Hoc Working Group on 
POPs, which developed a workplan for assessing available 
information on the chemistry, sources, toxicity, environmental 
dispersion and socioeconomic impacts of the 12 POPs.

In June 1996, the Ad Hoc Working Group convened a meeting of 
experts in Manila, the Philippines, and concluded that sufficient 
information existed to demonstrate the need for international 
action to minimize risks from the 12 POPs, including a global 
legally binding instrument. The meeting forwarded a recommendation 
to the UNEP GC and the World Health Assembly (WHA) that immediate 
international action be taken on the 12 POPs. In February 1997, 
the UNEP GC adopted decision 19/13C endorsing the conclusions and 
recommendations of the IFCS. The GC requested that UNEP, together 
with relevant international organizations, convene an 
intergovernmental negotiating committee (INC) with a mandate to 
develop, by the end of 2000, an international legally binding 
instrument for implementing international action, beginning with 
the list of 12 POPs. Also in February 1997, the second meeting of 
the IFCS decided that the Ad Hoc Working Group would continue to 
assist in the preparations for the negotiations. In May 1997, the 
WHA endorsed the recommendations of the IFCS and requested that 
the World Health Organization (WHO) participate actively in the 
negotiations. 

NEGOTIATION OF THE CONVENTION: The first session of the 
Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-1) was held from 29 
June to 3 July 1998, in Montreal, Canada. INC-1 requested the 
Secretariat to prepare a document containing material for possible 
inclusion in an international legally binding instrument. The 
second session of the INC was held from 25-29 January 1999, in 
Nairobi, Kenya, where participants discussed a Secretariat-
prepared outline of a convention text. The third session of the 
INC met from 6-11 September 1999, in Geneva, Switzerland, with 
delegates considering the revised draft text. They adopted a 
procedure establishing a review committee to apply screening 
criteria and to prepare a risk profile and risk management 
evaluation for proposed substances as a basis for further 
negotiation. The fourth session of the INC met from 20-25 March 
2000, in Bonn, Germany. Delegates drafted articles on technical 
assistance and on financial resources and mechanisms, addressed 
control measures, and made some headway on language on 
unintentionally produced POPs. The fifth session of the INC met 
from 4-10 December 2000, in Johannesburg, South Africa, with 
delegates concluding negotiations on the convention in the early 
morning hours of Saturday, 10 December. 

CONFERENCE OF PLENIPOTENTIARIES ON THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION: The 
Conference of the Plenipotentiaries convened from 22-23 May 2001, 
in Stockholm, Sweden. During the Diplomatic Conference, delegates 
adopted: the Stockholm Convention; resolutions adopted by INC-4 
and INC-5 addressing interim financial arrangements and issues 
related to the Basel Convention; resolutions forwarded by the 
Preparatory Meeting; and the Final Act. 

The Stockholm Convention calls for international action on 12 POPs 
grouped into three categories: 1) pesticides: aldrin, chlordane, 
DDT, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, mirex and toxaphene; 2) 
industrial chemicals: hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and polychlorinated 
biphenyls (PCBs); and 3) unintentionally produced POPs: dioxins 
and furans. Governments are to promote BAT and BEP for replacing 
existing POPs while preventing the development of new POPs. 
Provision has also been made for a procedure identifying 
additional POPs and the criteria to be considered in doing so. 

Key elements of the treaty include: the requirement that developed 
countries provide new and additional financial resources; measures 
to eliminate production and use of intentionally produced POPs, 
eliminate unintentionally produced POPs, where feasible, and 
manage and dispose of POPs wastes in an environmentally sound 
manner; and substitution involving the use of safer chemicals and 
processes to prevent unintentionally produced POPs. Precaution is 
operationalized throughout the Stockholm Convention, with specific 
references in the preamble, the objective and the provision on 
identifying new POPs. 

INC-6: INC-6 met from 17-21 June 2002, in Geneva, Switzerland. 
Delegates adopted decisions on: DDT and the register of specific 
exemptions; the POPs Review Committee; a clearing-house mechanism; 
technical assistance; financial resources and mechanisms and the 
interim financial mechanism; regional and subregional centers for 
capacity building and technology transfer; effectiveness 
evaluation; and non-compliance. INC-6 also established an Expert 
Group on BAT and BEP.

INC-7: The seventh session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating 
Committee (INC-7) was held from 14-18 July 2003, in Geneva, 
Switzerland. Delegates focused on addressing a number of 
“housekeeping” issues in preparation for the first COP. Decisions 
were adopted on, inter alia: offers to host the permanent 
Secretariat; technical assistance; national implementation plans; 
exempted use; party reporting; specific exemptions; DDT; interim 
financial arrangements; a standardized toolkit for the 
identification and quantification of dioxin and furan releases; 
measures to reduce or eliminate releases from stockpiles and 
wastes; effectiveness evaluation; the budget; and the financial 
mechanism.

COP-1: The first Conference of the Parties (COP-1) to the 
Stockholm Convention was held from 2-6 May 2005, in Punta del 
Este, Uruguay. To set the Convention’s implementation in motion, 
delegates adopted a broad range of decisions related to: providing 
for the evaluation of the continued need for DDT use for disease 
vector control; establishing a review process for entries in the 
register of specific exemptions; adopting guidance for the 
financial mechanism; establishing a schedule for reporting; 
establishing arrangements for monitoring data on POPs; adopting 
rules of procedure and financial rules; adopting the budget for 
the Secretariat; and establishing the POPRC. Other matters 
scheduled for discussion included: the format for the DDT Register 
and the Register of specific exemptions; the process for 
developing guidelines to assist parties in preventing the 
formation and release of unintentionally produced POPs; and 
guidelines on BAT and BEP. 

INTERSESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

ROTTERDAM CONVENTION COP-2: The second meeting of the Conference 
of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed 
Consent procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides 
in International Trade (PIC COP-2) was held from 27-30 September 
2005, in Rome, Italy. Delegates discussed and adopted 15 decisions 
on, inter alia: the programme of work and the budget for 2006; 
operational procedures of the Chemical Review Committee (CRC); the 
finalization of the arrangements between UNEP and the FAO for the 
provision of the secretariat to the Rotterdam Convention; pilot 
projects on the delivery of regional technical assistance; and 
cooperation and synergies between the Basel, Rotterdam and 
Stockholm Convention secretariats. Delegates agreed to forward a 
bracketed text on a compliance mechanism to COP-3 and to task the 
Secretariat with a study on financial mechanisms. 

FIRST MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON BAT/BEP: The Expert Group on 
Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practices held 
its first meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, from 28 November to 
2 December 2005. It aimed to enhance and strengthen the draft 
guidelines on BAT and provisional guidance on BEP, and to submit 
the result of its work to COP-3 of the Stockholm Convention. 
Delegates discussed a number of issues, inter alia: the needs and 
circumstances of developing countries and regions; elements that 
countries might take into account when establishing requirements 
for BAT, including economic and social considerations; and 
criteria that should be used for evaluating alternatives in 
comparison with conventional techniques and practices.

SAICM: At the International Conference on Chemicals Management, 
held from 4-6 February 2006, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 
delegates completed negotiations and adopted the Strategic 
Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM). This 
voluntary approach, which provides a framework for chemicals 
management, supports the goal agreed at the World Summit on 
Sustainable Development in 2002, in Johannesburg, South Africa, of 
minimizing the adverse effects of chemicals use and production on 
human health and the environment by 2020. The final agreement 
includes a high-level declaration from participants, an 
overarching policy strategy and global plan of action.

OEWG ON NON-COMPLIANCE: The first meeting of the Open-ended Ad hoc 
Working Group on Non-Compliance (OEWG NC) was held from 28-29 
April 2006, in Geneva, Switzerland. Delegates agreed to use, as 
the basis for discussion, a bracketed draft text on procedures and 
institutional mechanisms on non-compliance prepared by the 
Secretariat. Delegates addressed issues, including: establishment, 
composition and meeting frequency of the Compliance Committee; 
procedures for triggering non-compliance submissions to the 
Committee; measures to be taken by the Committee to facilitate 
compliance; and the decision-making process. Delegates added new 
proposals and brackets to the text, and agreed on a recommendation 
to COP-2 for the OEWG NC to reconvene as soon as appropriate. The 
OEWG NC report will be presented to delegates at COP-2.




This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin © <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is 
written and edited by Karen Alvarenga, Ph.D., Andrew Brooke, 
Alexis Conrad, Reem Hajjar, and Amber Moreen. The Digital Editor 
is Anders Gonçalves da Silva. The Editor is Pamela S. Chasek, 
Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and the Director of IISD Reporting Services 
is Langston James “Kimo” Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Sustaining 
Donors of the Bulletin are the Government of the United States of 
America (through the Department of State Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs), the 
Government of Canada (through CIDA), the Swiss Agency for 
Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), the United Kingdom 
(through the Department for International Development - DFID), the 
Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of Germany 
(through the German Federal Ministry of Environment - BMU, and the 
German Federal Ministry of Development Cooperation - BMZ), the 
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the European Commission 
(DG-ENV) and the Italian Ministry for the Environment and 
Territory General Directorate for Nature Protection. General 
Support for the Bulletin during 2006 is provided by the United 
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Government of Australia, 
the Austrian Federal Ministry for the Environment, the New Zealand 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, SWAN International, the 
Japanese Ministry of Environment (through the Institute for Global 
Environmental Strategies - IGES) and the Japanese Ministry of 
Economy, Trade and Industry (through the Global Industrial and 
Social Progress Research Institute - GISPRI). Funding for 
translation of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin into French has 
been provided by the International Organization of the 
Francophonie (IOF) and the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 
Funding for the translation of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin 
into Spanish has been provided by the Ministry of Environment of 
Spain. The opinions expressed in the Earth Negotiations Bulletin 
are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views 
of IISD or other donors. Excerpts from the Earth Negotiations 
Bulletin may be used in non-commercial publications with 
appropriate academic citation. For information on the Bulletin, 
including requests to provide reporting services, contact the 
Director of IISD Reporting Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, +1-646-
536-7556 or 212 East 47th St. #21F, New York, NY 10017, USA. The 
ENB Team at POPs COP-2 can be contacted by e-mail at 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected] 
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to IISD Reporting Services' free newsletters and lists for 
environment and sustainable development policy professionals at 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm

Reply via email to