<http://www.iisd.ca/>   Earth Negotiations Bulletin

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     
 A Reporting Service for Environment and Development Negotiations

 

PDF Format
 Spanish Version
French Version
IISD RS
web coverage <http://www.iisd.ca/biodiv/abs5/> 
 <http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb09388e.pdf> 
 <http://www.iisd.ca/vol09/enb09388s.html> 
 <http://www.iisd.ca/vol09/enb09388f.html> 


Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) 
<http://iisd.ca> 

 

Vol. 9 No. 388
Monday, 8 October 2007

FIFTH MEETINGS OF THE WORKING GROUPS ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING AND ON 
ARTICLE 8(J) OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: 

8-19 OCTOBER 2007

The fifth meeting of the Ad hoc Open-ended Intersessional Working Group on 
Access and Benefit-sharing (ABS) of the Convention on Biological Diversity 
(CBD) <http://www.iisd.ca/biodiv/abs5/>  opens today in Montreal, Canada, and 
will continue until 12 October 2007. It will be followed by the fifth meeting 
of the Ad hoc Open-ended Working Group on Article 8(j) and related provisions 
<http://www.iisd.ca/biodiv/wg8j-5/> , to be held from 15-19 October 2007 at the 
same location.

The Working Group on ABS will negotiate elements of an international regime on 
access and benefit-sharing (ABS) including: access to genetic resources; fair 
and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of their use; measures to support 
compliance with prior informed consent (PIC) and mutually agreed terms (MAT); 
an internationally recognized certificate of origin/source/legal provenance of 
genetic resources; capacity building; and indicators for ABS. Negotiations on 
the international ABS regime will continue at the Working Group's sixth session 
to be held from 21-25 January 2008, in Geneva, Switzerland.

The Working Group on Article 8(j) will consider, among other items: an action 
plan for the retention of traditional knowledge; traditional knowledge in the 
context of an international ABS regime; mechanisms to promote the participation 
of indigenous peoples; the development of sui generis systems for the 
protection of traditional knowledge, innovations and practices; and elements of 
an ethical code of conduct to ensure respect for the cultural and intellectual 
heritage of indigenous and local communities. The Working Group's 
recommendations will be submitted to the ninth meeting of the Conference of the 
Parties (COP 9) to the CBD, to be held from 19-30 May 2008, in Bonn, Germany.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CBD, ARTICLE 8(J), AND ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING

The CBD, negotiated under the auspices of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), 
was opened for signature on 5 June 1992, and entered into force on 29 December 
1993. There are currently 190 parties to the Convention, which aims to promote 
the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of its components, and 
the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic 
resources.

Access to genetic resources, including facilitating access, PIC and MAT, and 
benefit-sharing are addressed by CBD Article 15, with related articles 
referring to technology access and transfer (Article 16.3), and handling and 
distribution of benefits of biotechnology (Article 19).

The Convention's work on ABS was initiated at COP 4 (May 1998, Bratislava, 
Slovakia) when parties decided to establish a regionally-balanced expert panel 
(EP) on ABS, whose composition and agenda were discussed at an intersessional 
meeting on the Operations of the Convention (June 1999, Montreal, Canada). The 
first meeting of the EP on ABS (October 1999, San José, Costa Rica) developed a 
set of recommendations including general conclusions and specific points on PIC 
and MAT, information needs and capacity building. The second meeting (March 
2001, Montreal, Canada) addressed user and provider experience in ABS 
processes; approaches for stakeholder involvement; and complementary options to 
address ABS within the CBD framework. COP 5 (May 2000, Nairobi, Kenya) 
established the Working Group on ABS to develop guidelines and other approaches 
on: PIC and MAT; participation of stakeholders; benefit-sharing mechanisms; and 
the preservation of traditional knowledge.

Article 8(j) of the CBD states that its parties will, subject to national 
legislation, respect, preserve and maintain knowledge, innovations and 
practices of indigenous and local communities embodying traditional lifestyles 
relevant for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity; promote 
their wider application with the approval and involvement of knowledge-holders; 
and encourage the equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of 
such knowledge. Related provisions address the customary use of biological 
resources in accordance with traditional cultural practice (Article 10(c)), 
information exchange (Article 17.2) and cooperation in the development and use 
of technologies (Article 18.4).

The Convention's work under Article 8(j) commenced with COP 3 (November 1996, 
Buenos Aires, Argentina) calling for an intersessional workshop to advance work 
on implementation of Article 8(j). The workshop was held in November 1997 in 
Madrid, Spain, and suggested terms of reference for an open-ended working group 
on Article 8(j), which were later adopted by COP 4. The first meeting of the 
Working Group on Article 8(j) (March 2000, Seville, Spain) considered elements 
for a programme of work on Article 8(j), and also addressed forms of protection 
for traditional knowledge. COP 5 extended the Working Group's mandate to review 
progress in implementation; explored ways for increasing participation; and 
adopted a programme of work on Article 8(j), comprising elements and tasks on 
participatory mechanisms, status and trends of traditional knowledge, 
traditional cultural practices for conservation and sustainable use, 
benefit-sharing, exchange and dissemination of information, and monitoring and 
legal elements.

ABS WG 1: At its first meeting (October 2001, Bonn, Germany), the Working Group 
on ABS started developing the Bonn Guidelines on ABS and also: identified 
elements for a capacity-building action plan; and considered the role of 
intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the implementation of ABS arrangements.

ARTICLE 8(J) WG 2: At its second meeting (February 2002, Montreal, Canada), the 
Working Group on Article 8(j) considered: an outline for the composite report 
on the status and trends of traditional knowledge; recommendations and draft 
guidelines for the conduct of cultural, environmental and social impact 
assessments; participatory mechanisms; and the effectiveness of existing 
instruments impacting the protection of traditional knowledge, particularly 
IPRs.

COP 6: At its sixth meeting (April 2002, The Hague, the Netherlands), the COP 
adopted the Bonn Guidelines on ABS and also considered: other approaches, 
including capacity building; the role of IPRs in the implementation of ABS 
arrangements; and the relationship with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects 
of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) of the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
The COP identified actions to be taken with respect to the integration of 
Article 8(j) into CBD thematic work programmes, and adopted the outline of the 
composite report.

WORLD SUMMIT ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: In the Johannesburg Plan of 
Implementation, the UN World Summit on Sustainable Development (September 2002, 
Johannesburg, South Africa) called for negotiation, within the CBD framework, 
of an international regime for benefit-sharing.

MYPOW: Following the call of the 2002 World Summit, the Open-ended 
Intersessional Meeting on the Multi-Year Programme of Work for the CBD COP up 
to 2010 (March 2003, Montreal, Canada) recommended that the ABS Working Group 
consider the process, nature, scope, elements and modalities of an 
international regime on ABS.

ABS WG 2: At its second meeting (December 2003, Montreal, Canada), the ABS 
Working Group debated the process, nature, scope, elements and modalities of an 
international regime on ABS, and also considered measures to ensure compliance 
with PIC and MAT, and capacity building.

ARTICLE 8(J) WG 3: At its third meeting (December 2003, Montreal, Canada), the 
Working Group considered: recommendations from the UN Permanent Forum on 
Indigenous Issues (UNPFII); potential socioeconomic impacts of genetic use 
restriction technologies (GURTs); elements for sui generis systems for the 
protection of traditional knowledge; participatory mechanisms; the Akwé: Kon 
guidelines for the conduct of cultural, environmental and social impact 
assessments; and the composite report.

COP 7: At its seventh meeting (February 2004, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), the COP 
adopted the Action Plan on capacity building for ABS, mandated the ABS Working 
Group to negotiate an international regime on ABS and agreed on the terms of 
reference for such a negotiation. The COP adopted the Akwé: Kon Guidelines and 
a series of decisions regarding participatory mechanisms for indigenous and 
local communities.

ABS WG 3: At its third meeting (February 2005, Bangkok, Thailand), the Working 
Group initiated negotiations on an international regime on ABS. It also 
addressed: additional approaches to complement the Bonn Guidelines, such as an 
international certificate of origin/source/legal provenance; measures to ensure 
compliance with PIC and MAT; and options for indicators for ABS.

ARTICLE 8(J) WG 4: At its fourth meeting (January 2006, Granada, Spain), the 
Working Group considered, inter alia: collaboration with the ABS Working Group; 
participatory mechanisms; elements for an ethical code of conduct for the 
respect of the cultural and intellectual heritage of indigenous and local 
communities; GURTs; and the composite report.

ABS WG 4: At its fourth meeting (February 2006, Granada, Spain), the Working 
Group considered: a draft text for the negotiation of the international ABS 
regime; additional approaches to complement the Bonn Guidelines, including an 
international certificate of origin/source/legal provenance; and measures to 
support compliance with PIC and MAT.

COP 8: At its eighth meeting (March 2006, Curitiba, Brazil), the COP decided to 
transmit the ABS WG 4 outcome to ABS WG 5 as well as the outcomes of an Ad hoc 
Technical Expert Group on a certificate of origin/source/legal provenance for 
the further elaboration of an international ABS regime. The COP requested the 
Article 8(j) Working Group to contribute to the mandate of the ABS Working 
Group and adopted a number of decisions, including on participatory mechanisms 
and sui generis systems for the protection of traditional knowledge.

INTERSESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

WIPO MEETINGS: At recent meetings of the World Intellectual Property 
Organization (WIPO) Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and 
Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (24-28 April 2006; 30 
November - 8 December 2006; and 3-12 July, 2007, Geneva, Switzerland), members 
considered an international mechanism for the protection of traditional 
knowledge and folklore and the need for international regulation on genetic 
resources and traditional knowledge.

TRIPS COUNCIL: At recent meetings of the TRIPS Council (14-15 June 2006; 25-26 
October 2006; and 5 June 2007, Geneva, Switzerland), members considered 
submissions regarding the relationship between TRIPS and the CBD, including 
disclosure of the source of biological materials and evidence of PIC and MAT in 
patent applications.

CBD EXPERT GROUP ON THE CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN: The Expert Group (22-25 January 
2007, Lima, Peru) discussed the feasibility and potential costs and benefits of 
different options for a certificate of origin/source/legal provenance.

UNPFII 6: At the sixth session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues  
(14-25 May 2007, New York) members urged UNPFII to prepare: a legal analysis on 
states, peoples and sovereignty and their relationship, scope and application 
in an international ABS regime; and a report on the social, cultural and 
economic impacts of commercialization of genetic resources and indigenous 
knowledge on indigenous peoples.

UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: On 13 September 2007, the 
UN General Assembly adopted the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 
(UNDRIP) with 143 member states voting in favor, eleven abstaining, and 
Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US voting against the Declaration.

UNITED NATIONS INTER-AGENCY SUPPORT GROUP ON INDIGENOUS ISSUES: Aiming to 
support indigenous and local community participation in the working groups on 
ABS and Article 8(j), this meeting (19-20 September 2007) addressed, among 
other items, implications of UNDRIP for the negotiation of an international ABS 
regime.

This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin © <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > is written and edited by Asheline Appleton, Sikina 
Jinnah, Harry Jonas, Stefan Jungcurt, Ph.D. and Nicole Schabus. The Digital 
Editor is Leila Mead. The Editor is Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and the Director of IISD Reporting Services is 
Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >. 
The Sustaining Donors of the Bulletin are the United Kingdom (through the 
Department for International Development - DFID), the Government of the United 
States of America (through the Department of State Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs), the Government of Canada 
(through CIDA), the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of 
Germany (through the German Federal Ministry of Environment - BMU, and the 
German Federal Ministry of Development Cooperation - BMZ), the Netherlands 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the European Commission (DG-ENV) and the Italian 
Ministry for the Environment, Land and Sea. General Support for the Bulletin 
during 2007 is provided by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), 
the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Environment, the 
Government of Australia, the Austrian Federal Ministry for the Environment, the 
Ministry of Environment of Sweden, the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs 
and Trade, SWAN International, the Japanese Ministry of Environment (through 
the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies - IGES) and the Japanese 
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (through the Global Industrial and 
Social Progress Research Institute - GISPRI). Funding for translation of the 
Earth Negotiations Bulletin into French has been provided by the International 
Organization of the Francophonie (IOF) and the French Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs. Funding for the translation of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin into 
Spanish has been provided by the Ministry of Environment of Spain. The opinions 
expressed in the Earth Negotiations Bulletin are those of the authors and do 
not necessarily reflect the views of IISD or other donors. Excerpts from the 
Earth Negotiations Bulletin may be used in non-commercial publications with 
appropriate academic citation. For information on the Bulletin, including 
requests to provide reporting services, contact the Director of IISD Reporting 
Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >, +1-646-536-7556 or 
300 East 56th St. Apt 11A, New York, NY 10022, USA. The ENB Team at CBD ABS-WG5 
can be contacted by e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >. 

You are currently subscribed to enb as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to IISD Reporting Services' free newsletters and lists for 
environment and sustainable development policy professionals at 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm

Reply via email to